avclub-57d020e695d539d5ef513aa0be1a18e9--disqus
Space Coyote
avclub-57d020e695d539d5ef513aa0be1a18e9--disqus

Thanks! It was funny, people would say things like "I'm pretty late to this, so probably no one will see this, but…" and I'd be like "hey, I see it! It may be 7 years later, but someone read it".

I'm with you. I liked Juliette and am definitely not on the Juliette haters bandwagon, but I think narratively it would be a super bad idea to bring her back.

Oh yeah, I had forgotten the wife beater wesen! I was thinking even further back, like @sallgood_man:disqus said, to when Juliette was in the dark. Some gigantor wesen came rampaging in and breaking shit, and Juliette went all independent capable woman on him. But he might not have actually been killed either.

This seems like the appropriate place to say: I really miss the AVC coverage of Supernatural. I had an accident where I fractured my spine about a year ago, and was basically housebound for two months. I made my way through all of Supernatural on Netflix since I had seen you guys often reference it in the Grimm

I like the idea of Wesen revolutionaries wanting to go public. Why should they remain hidden when they're like, 80% of the Portland population?

I dunno. It creeps me out a little, but at the same time, it is Nick's kid. Nick's not a terrible person, so he cares about his kid, and Adalind is the baggage that comes with. I'm not sure if there is a better solution. He doesn't want to set them up in their own place because he thinks they would be in danger.

Eisbiber! I mean, that's what Bud is. I don't think that's exactly what she was though.

Renard was shot there, but he survived, obvs. Wasn't there some huge Wesen that attacked them in the house and Juliette beat the shit out it with a frying pan? Or was that a fever dream I had?

PREACH.

THIS. I was in college before these concepts were really introduced, and I fought them tooth and nail. When I taught college courses, I found my students did the same. When you're so used to an absolute right answer coming from higher authority, why wouldn't you transfer the same line of thinking to everything in life?

That's a really interesting article! And now that I think about it, it surprises me not at all that there is a contingent of people for whom ground up lips and assholes is not good enough for their precious pet, even though it meets their nutritional needs. I wonder how large that contingent actually is, though, since

I think we might have the same top 10…..GET OUT OF MY HEAD!

We are agreed on your first sentiments for sure. The decision to get a pet of any kind (in my humble opinion this also applied to having kids) should be backed up with lots of consideration, research, and ultimately good reasons. I also agree that once you make that decision, you're making a commitment to do

Poor Snoopy. He was a good dog, despite claims of it being impossible to know.

I think the first time I watched it I was like 'NOT FUNNY.' because I'm bothered by any animal violence, but I think upon second viewing it becomes much funnier knowing that Baxter survived absolutely no worse for wear, has adventures, and returns to save the day.

I did do a Google search before asking, actually. Those articles are all citing the same primary source, a book called "Time to Eat the Dog?" by a New Zealand couple named Vale. It was equally quick and easy to find articles identifying major problems with the assumptions the authors made (whether on purpose or not)

This is kind of a silly road to go down. For example, you could say the same thing about anyone who has a child (and maybe you do). But then where do you draw the line? Are people who care about the environment never allowed to fly lest they be hypocrites? Are they allowed to eat meat? How much? My dog helps with my

Cite your sources, yo.

Even at 8 years old I was like "This….is terrible."

I think he was a mandroid.