avclub-55c6017b10a9755ef3681b09ccb01e94--disqus
in fits of print
avclub-55c6017b10a9755ef3681b09ccb01e94--disqus

You can't "prove" that God exists, because proof, in the sense you mean it, is a scientific concept not a theological one. Science is a system for describing the world based on observation and demonstration. Theology is a different way of looking at the world, with different rules, and the scientific method isn't

If we could prove, theologically, that science exists, what would that mean? Or if we could prove musically that literature exists? Or if we could prove, by playing poker, the existence of chess?

They were both in Chronicles of Narnia, but Neeson was, conveniently, represented by a CGI lion the whole time.

I hate the groovies.

I'm actually considering turning off Adblock just to see this Newcastle guy I've been hearing so much about.

If they stick with ten nominees a year, every wide-release film remotely worth watching is getting a best picture nomination from here on out. So I'd say it's a safe bet.

Ratatouille
The Incredibles
Wall-E
Up
Monsters, Inc.
Finding Nemo
A Bug's Life
Cars

Jesus, again? That endless "Wrong Trousers" thread finally had us convinced you weren't a troll, and now you go and blow it. I retract my earlier sincerity.

I remember Monsters, Inc. being bottom-half Pixar, which is to say, still pretty great. The ad-infinitum door gag was the bast part.

I'm pretty sure Disney's in charge of the trailers, and "looks like another Shrek movie" sounds like their exact target.

(Crazy For You But) Not That Crazy
Zombie Boy
Absolutely Cuckoo
I Wish I Had an Evil Twin
Yeah! Oh Yeah!

A Ptolemy with a thing for snakes? She'll have to skip the blackface, but at least she can reprise the Russian accent she came up with for "Alexander".

Remember when Bruce Wayne totally fucked over his company's greedy, amoral CEO? Who was then never heard from again? And that CEO was played by Rutger Hauer? That seems like it deserves revisiting.

By assimilating their discography, he knocks out (Bloodbuzz) Ohio and (You've Done it Again,) Virginia. 46 to go!

I think by "complex" epochalypse may have just meant "complicated," since I had to read that synopsis three times to make head or tail of it.

As I see it, Disney had the next Indiana Jones right in their hands, and somehow mistook it for the next Star Wars. Calamity ensued.

I understand intellectual, social and aesthetic ambition, and the desire to emulate and seek the approval of those we admire. And while I don't believe in mocking people for what they like, I do believe that good art, literature, style, etc. are better than bad. My tastes have changed drastically over the years, to

But Yankee Deer, you're echoing his premise that animated films are a "niche interest" or "personal obsession," which is what I find ridiculous. They're beloved far and wide, by mainstream audiences and cinephiles alike. In fact, he belies this himself by saying that they're too unpopular to get you liked in high

Substitute your "hard and cool" high school friends for my geeky biology/poli-sci ones, and our circles become—minus what sounds like a certain level of general dickishness—exactly the same. In the same two boroughs of the same city. And never out of any of the three have I heard an opinion remotely resembling the

this thread is streets behind