avclub-52bab5ffa9a0fe56e1bff9a3f70a5283--disqus
onlytheknocker
avclub-52bab5ffa9a0fe56e1bff9a3f70a5283--disqus

I see people say things along these lines, but it always seems so abstract. The fact that they posted something on social media isn't the point, it's what they post. It seems reasonable to stop being friends with someone who has misogynistic or racist views whether they say these things to you in person or you see

Even continuing to be a friend and distancing herself professionally from him.

Obviously the focus should be on Metzger, but there isn't much to say there. He's a piece of shit. Bringing Schumer into the discussion, she's a feminist and she's actually someone people have heard of so the question of why she's employing the guy seems valid.

Well, Metzger has self-identified as being "pro-rape," so with him I guess.

Because that guy's got some rape allegations too?

What is also often not mentioned is that Francis Ford Coppola supported him while he struggled to get work after getting out of jail for raping that kid.

But this is the movie that he made after going to jail for raping a child and Disney of all companies is the one who hired him.

You want me to find an article that specifically says you don't need to have "200% contempt for any man accused (accused, not convicted) of rape, even if there is absolutely no evidence proving him guilty, [otherwise] you are obviously a hateful misogynist promoting rape culture (and probably secretly a rapist

Markees Christmas!

Maybe you should try reading instead of just browsing and you'll actually learn the most popular opinions instead of weird strawman arguments you just made up.

But I'm just not sure why you're writing "Cale Hartmann" as a name of someone accused of rape.

I've read a tiny bit about the actual rape accusations and don't know how much UCB knows. How much I know is not enough for me to make any sort of judgment. Apparently they won't tell the UCB who accused him or any details about the alleged rape(s). I understand why he would be upset.

Kurt Metzger wasn't fired over rumors, he was fired over shit he was writing on the internet which is about the most verifiable thing possible.

This comes up again and again and I'm not sure what people don't understand. There is no legal requirement on a private company like UCB to ban a guy. It might be wrong, but they are free to ban whoever they want.

That's not the name of the guy. I'm very confused.

Kurt Metzger's been a piece of shit for years, but this is because a guy at UCB NY has been accused of rape.

It's a relief to know that we only have proof that he is a drunken maniac who is almost certainly emotionally abusive instead of any videos of him actually punching or kicking her. I can sleep well now.

I like you

she dropped them for $7 million dollars