But there's never any left behind!
trilobiter
avclub-5171864ab150444a2bcff2d4c52d3064--disqus
I remember in high school English we had to do presentations on song lyrics, analyzing them for metaphors and similes and what not. One guy did Behind Blue Eyes, and yes, he did the Bizkit version. That was the first time I heard it, and it made me very sad.
I remember in high school English we had to do presentations on song lyrics, analyzing them for metaphors and similes and what not. One guy did Behind Blue Eyes, and yes, he did the Bizkit version. That was the first time I heard it, and it made me very sad.
I shudder to think that Limp Bizkit is still big enough to tour somewhere in this crazy world, but I'm sure glad it isn't here.
I shudder to think that Limp Bizkit is still big enough to tour somewhere in this crazy world, but I'm sure glad it isn't here.
They don't think you'll say it. They're just hoping that the rump part of your brain (the one makes all the decisions you don't pay any attention to) thinks it for at least a few minutes.
They don't think you'll say it. They're just hoping that the rump part of your brain (the one makes all the decisions you don't pay any attention to) thinks it for at least a few minutes.
People who think Motown is a doo-wop label are very strange people.
People who think Motown is a doo-wop label are very strange people.
Sounds like the kind of thing a Professor says to fuck with his students. I had an English professor teaching a class on television shows who kept insisting that television was a superior medium to literature.
Sounds like the kind of thing a Professor says to fuck with his students. I had an English professor teaching a class on television shows who kept insisting that television was a superior medium to literature.
Maybe it does, but I didn't mean it that way. What I mean is that recognizing art as the product of the artist is the only real way to make sense of the existence of art in the first place. Art owes its creation to some particular person, and understanding something about the creator always adds something to the…
Maybe it does, but I didn't mean it that way. What I mean is that recognizing art as the product of the artist is the only real way to make sense of the existence of art in the first place. Art owes its creation to some particular person, and understanding something about the creator always adds something to the…
My instincts tell me no on this. It's an ostensible step toward objectivity, but objectivity is ultimately impossible with art. It requires context, and the author is the ultimate context.
My instincts tell me no on this. It's an ostensible step toward objectivity, but objectivity is ultimately impossible with art. It requires context, and the author is the ultimate context.
I would have liked that comment anyway, but I wish to register a separate like for "Me Got you Babe."
I would have liked that comment anyway, but I wish to register a separate like for "Me Got you Babe."
It wasn't powerful, but it was beautiful nonetheless. She certainly got treated better than her peers for reasons that weren't very good, but she more than justified herself in her singing.