avclub-51096670a18de3dbac0e197cf09db6da--disqus
Kevin N
avclub-51096670a18de3dbac0e197cf09db6da--disqus

He must be that deaf dumb blind kid.

The movie was a disappointment. The soundtrack was pretty decent, though.

Du bist nur ein Backstein in der Mauer.

Or the study of the collected legal works of Senator Hatch.

Holy crap my parents have lots of good stuff on their cable on TCM or whatever but they refuse to get a DVR or even VCR so they just invariably watch some western channel, turning it on in the middle of some old western TV series whenever they sit down. And 90% of what is on that channel is crap.

Holy crap I hate this. I won't watch movies with my family anymore because of this. Dad falls asleep thirty seconds in. Mom reads her iPad or a PAPERBACK and says she's watching. Brother and everybody else are on the iPhones. The last straw was when they all wanted to watch "Inception" and I said, "OK, but you

Your link don't work, brah, on account of your typo.

It's possible to do it well. Often it's used to best effect when it's invisible, used in movies you didn't even know had special effects.

TL;DR

High school us wanted to marry people present us know would've driven us crazy.

You can see all the alternatives he came up with before scribing "She got thighs like what what what".

Ah. In that case, I guess I'd take the six months.

From what I recall, the documents he "liberated" were already available without a fee to anybody who wanted to go to campus to access them, which makes the potentially long jail sentence kind of ridiculous.

It was a lot more than 6 months. A lot.

I think they've made a movie about Audie Murphy, but I don't think it was any good and another might be warranted. (Oops—that was also WWII.)

Free cookie?

I'm still confused, but it was interesting.

I think you're asking the wrong question. The question here is: were they breaking the law as it was written? The question of whether the law makes sense or is fair is left to congress, which doesn't always succeed in this respect.

If that is indeed true, how do sports bars get away with it? Do they have to pay some extra fee to show games?

But there was no violation of the law. If a company puts an antenna on your house and you pay them a fee to rent the antenna, this is clearly legal. Now imagine that company puts the antenna 100 miles from your house. There doesn't seem to be a provision in the law against that.