avclub-42763705844bf5e2af4abd6c898f8dcb--disqus
Captcha Reader
avclub-42763705844bf5e2af4abd6c898f8dcb--disqus

You should do that more often.

That one is probably just in the coming-of-age ghetto.

Midnight in Paris has funnier writing and better acting though.

Dammit, I still need to see Damsels in Distress.

Reefer Madness is great, but I guess it doesn't qualify for being a TV movie?

Yeah, why not name them "the ___ Movie crowd"? Are there even that many "Not Another"-films? Isn't Not Another Teen Movie, like, the only one?

You don't expect AV Club writers to care for movies that are older than their target audience, do you?

I really loved half of that film, I just felt actively insulted by the other half.

You might have a case with Frances HA, but Obvious Child has all the beats and structure of a typical romcom. I also found it funny.

Huh? Why not Obvious Child? It's almost a classic romantic comedy.

Cera is not bad in the movie, I guess, but at no point I thought I actually saw the character from the comic.

Good call on Amélie. I can only guess they didn't see it as a comedy?

My favorite from this decade is Magic In The Moonlight which doesn't have that problem at all thanks to being a period piece.

I bee what you did there.

Without even including Jalla! Jalla!

21 Jump Street deserves to be on this list, 22 Jump Street was half clever-meta-satire and half tired gay jokes.

What is weird about a human woman falling in love with the bee which was responsible for all flowers dying because it won a courtroom trial?

Imaginary movies weren't eligible.

Crash came out 1996 though.

You do realize that Match Point already was the seventh not-Woody Allen-starring film of his career (eighth if you count Radio Days, and he has only been in three of his last thirteen films), yes? Not to mention that he actually was in several films that are more beloved than Match Point, so it doesn't really show us