The rest of his post makes it clear that he's using "sexism" as "institutional sexism", and he very clearly states individual people can be prejudiced or bigoted.

I read a lot of presidential history as a kid, so I remembered Leslie Lynch King. I didn't remember Clinton's birth name but I did remember his birth father disappearing shortly after his birth and that his mother gave him his stepfather's name when she remarried.

Despite the fact that they're running sponsored links for it, AVC still doesn't see fit to mention Big Time in Hollywood, FL in WOT.

Well, if you DESIRED a car, it wouldn't be necessary to keep trying to sell you one.

Internet, Your Mother And I Have Been Talking, And We Think It's Time For You To Move Out

Indeed he was.

I don't remember him threatening to kill Loretta, just Ava.

Oh, it was unmistakable. But he was just grazed- hence the bandage on his head

I think he's sincere, but in large part because there's nothing left for him as a criminal, and because he's good at preaching. Call it penitent by necessity.

I'm surprised Boyd didn't escape the hospital by just having someone wheel him out of there in broad daylight.

The thing is, Raylan getting shot by Boon would have absolutely worked for a real tragedy— since one of the defining elements of a tragedy is that your past actions always catch up to you, no matter what you try to do to avoid the consequences, and this final showdown was certainly a product, in a sense, of Raylan's…

I was just the 79th A vote with no votes for any other grade. I don't ever think I've seen that before.

You are self-awareness challenged.

"According to me, most people would call me liberal, so the fact that I am taking this conservative position must mean it is right!"

The AV Club

Don't try to change or remove from what he said to fit your agenda. He stated very clearly the difference between individual and institutional discrimination.

I didn't know a yes or no question was "changing your agenda." I wanted to know if you thought that was a real problem or not, or if you're more concerned about, to paraphrase you elsewhere, only certain groups of people having complaints of bigotry taken seriously.

It's not a non-sequitur, it entirely relates to your complaint that "Only some groups should be allowed to whine about being the victims of sexism (or racism or anything else)." You can whine all you want, but by and large people are going to give a shit a lot more about the people who feel real institutional bigotry.

If "entitlement rage" is a term for people who rage because they aren't quite as entitled as they used to be, like spoiled children… well, that's actually an effective term.

"Woman say harassment sexism. Man say being told not to harass reverse sexism. You take serious, who?"