I didn't even know the meaning of that word. That is how out of fucking touch this guy is.
I didn't even know the meaning of that word. That is how out of fucking touch this guy is.
I'm pretty sure he's just Mike Pence.
Well, we've definitely broken a lot of things. Like the whole Middle East!
I'd assume there are probably some people that have medical issues through the transitioning process that would make military service difficult. But that doesn't call for a blanket ban on transgendered people, it calls for addressing those specific medical issues.
If being around gay people/women/trans people is killing unit cohesion so much…then maybe we need fewer dick heads in the military.
I'd wager at least 20-30% do.
Well, he might be right there. His vote counts just as much as mine. That strikes me as some kind of a failure.
Outside of the fact that you're a massive asshole and that trans people aren't "deranged"…I think there's a pretty strong case for deranged weirdos making the military stronger.
Heterodox opinions are fine. Yours aren't.
Ha, of COURSE you're a fedora guy.
Anyone else remember when Mike Pence wrote a diatribe about how destructive the movie Mulan was because it showed a woman in the military?
That's why Mexico is paying for it!
Sadly it's even worse than that. People on the other side need to be able to see the "60 lbs of drugs" people are throwing over the wall so it doesn't hit them in the head and kill them.
Build a wall and make Mexico pay for it?
As I've said to several other replies to this comment, I don't watch the show very much and I totally accept that what I have seen is apparently not representative of the show itself. I made a wrong assumption based on my sample size.
John McCain must be stopped. Who can do it?
John McCain is the human embodiment of the "die a hero or live long enough to become a villain" line.
There are some trying to do that, certainly. But the majority aren't.
I completely admit that I haven't watched that much of the show, just bits here and there. I probably just got an inaccurate sample.
I think it's less "why is this happening" and more "why is it happening in this specific way"