avclub-3bca94e353e508c1a49bf984fc5c346d--disqus
Renaton
avclub-3bca94e353e508c1a49bf984fc5c346d--disqus

HOLY SHIT THAT'S THE BEST IDEA IN THE HISTORY OF ALL UNIVERSES!

Not to defend Richard, who was wrong to do what he did, but it always struck as sorta clueless to just bring your teenage boyfriend to dinner with your grandfather and not even tell him about it first. Yes, he is aware she dates and said she could invite anyone, but that still doesn't change the fact that it's only

@wolfmansRazor:disqus doesn't sound like a pat on the back to me, it just sounds like you're polite and have great taste in films, gay or not.

Oh, I didn't mean that straight critics and film fans have never liked or loved films like these, it was more a mere observation that is more about the cultural aspect of people's different reactions  to specific takes on homosexuality in art given their background and their own sexuality, and how when you look at it

I understand D'Angelo's comment about bias, and I think it's refreshingly honest, even though I'm gay. But I do wish gay critics would speak more of how these bias has affected filmmaking about subjects that deal with homosexuality in the past. And I'm not talking the usual "gay indie film" that is a coming out story

Because Payne wants to be a deep and serious auteur and so he is using a gimmick, just like every little trick he usually does to make it look like he is more of a director than he really is and to disguise that his films are more than sappy indie melodramedies.

Most critics say it's minor Payne or simple don't like it and are usual supporters of his schtick. D'Angelo doesn't like his schtick, but liked the film anyways. So I think I'll like it. It still probably won't be enough for me to understand what is this massive hard-on american critics have for him, but it does look

The next few weeks will be marvelous with Jess tearing these threads apart and the Bracebridge dinner. Also, more Paris, which is always better than less Paris.

Goddammit! I just finished the show, and I loved every episode of season two! From "Sexy People…" to "Original Bitch", the show is just on a roll and is nothing but A episodes (thinking about the actual order, not the one that aired). Had this aired on tv it could've been the story of the season among critics, because

Oh, and it's not that Chloe lacks empathy, she just bottles it and pretends it doesn't exist. And while Camp C.U.T.S. does indicate she and Teddy are sociopaths, we don't know their exact disorder. Either way, Emily, you're forgetting a bunch of moments that were leading to a more open Chloe, like the end of the

I don't see the racism, and a film doesn't necessarily needs great performances and script to be really good.

@avclub-e053e4f47a7ccbc51be254596e483d7c:disqus Counterpoint: No, it wasn't.

You know, I liked Ben & Kate, but I don't really miss it. And those last two episodes that aired in the original run showed the show was gonna be just another sitcom with time, as it was already starting to feel formulaic.

@wolfmansRazor:disqus I have read over 20 reviews, and the response varies way too much to call it negative, with the response being especially passionate in the positive ones.

She'd trank-dart you before you even tried.

I love some of the weird jokes that go longer than you think in that episode (which is something the show does very well). Like Luther telling June how short his mother was.

I liked that they explained the random James Franco aversion JVDB has by having him sweat like crazy while shooting with Sean Penn in "Milk".

Agreed. I don't like when a film shows or tells me backstory. It should be implied by the interactions and overall context of the film alone.

James Van Der Beek posted the right order of the episodes on Facebook.

I MISS THIS SHOW SO FUCKING MUCH!