avclub-397c047266340d0ca4716d71fc5d037b--disqus
shia labeouf
avclub-397c047266340d0ca4716d71fc5d037b--disqus

But really, Unless they ban the use of cell phones in the museum anywhere than in the lobby or something (which I really see no problem with, as it's your personal choice to go to the museum, outside of field trips probably, wherein kids shouldn't be allowed to use their phones anyhow) then they shouldn't say "You

As with most things here, it can be both things.

And that's a wonderful quote and I absolutely appreciated it. But perhaps you should read the article and determine if it's a question about weed, like a sock maker secretly working on a top secret sock that may or may not be a sock.

This isn't a question about weed.

I re-watched the second video which was taken from the cell phone of the store owner … while I'm pretty certain most cops would deem it resisting arrest (which I don't know if they had reasonable cause to arrest him at the point at which they tackled him, video doesn't show enough) I hadn't noticed before that, for a

So I've heard. But that's not really a defensible statement.

There's no "against all evidence" when you can't see what his right hand was doing and he was keeping his gun in his right pocket. But if he HAD been going for his gun—which we can't say for sure either way—and, say, his gun went off and killed an innocent bystander, you'd still be bitching about the cops and how they

Wait, so you can tell me exactly what his right hand was doing even though we can't see it in any of the video?? Amazing!

Do you know for a fact that Sterling wasn't reaching for his gun?

You know cops are still just people, right? Not all police training across the country is going to be as comprehensive and not all police are going to come out of it hardened and "able to deal with any situation," either. And no one, white or otherwise, should go into any encounter with a police officer and think

Well, OK, my statement of the person who called being complicit is a concession for people who will never admit that it's possible Sterling's death was justified. It's a statement for those who believe wholeheartedly that he was in no way doing anything wrong based on hearsay.

I think people should be allowed to reserve the right to be hesitant with regard to Sterling as we can't see his right hand in any video that's been released so far and his gun was in his right pocket … I know that if it were me I wouldn't have been reaching for a gun especially when the cops have already tackled me

Castile's they should very much respond with outrage. No one who is licensed to carry a concealed handgun should be shot for informing an officer that they're exercising their right to carry. He even did more than he is technically required to in most states (though it totally depends on the officer's usually

But that could describe so many musicians! What about Isaac Brock? Actually he's the only other person I can think of off-hand. But I'm positive I read a story here about the guy from Wavves doing that and then having to post a facebook apology or something.

It's a pretty off-hand comment, don't be a wiener.

I would imagine that feller probably supports censorship, as well.

Wait, is this the same guy who got really wasted at a show (in Germany?) and said "a bunch of awful shit"? (I've only read about it, but never read into what he'd said because, you know, he's just some musician and, as one (popular!) musician once told me, most musicians aren't very smart.)

I'm so behind on this … It can be both things!

"Mistakenly," the only way it happens!

Football and basketball. If I could JUST get the channels needed to watch football and basketball, I'd have TV. Jesus.