So when you find a reviewer to just kiss Sorkin's ass and praise the show all the time, you won't mind all the comments from people wondering why the reviewer has his head up his ass because the show is clearly horrible? And then they'll demand someone who reviews the show honestly.

In episode 3 most of the candidates interviewed on screen for or against the Tea Party were made up.

In episode 3 most of the candidates interviewed on screen for or against the Tea Party were made up.

My strategy regarding Ms. Munn: I want to bang her, therefore I will watch her. Problem solved

My strategy regarding Ms. Munn: I want to bang her, therefore I will watch her. Problem solved

I think Sorkin's point is that he doesn't have to think critically because he just knows better. But then again I suspect he thinks he is thinking critically.

I think Sorkin's point is that he doesn't have to think critically because he just knows better. But then again I suspect he thinks he is thinking critically.

What writers room? It's just Sorkin pulling stuff out of his ass

What writers room? It's just Sorkin pulling stuff out of his ass

This show is much worse than Studio 60 because it plays fast and loose with actual events, and lets all its characters shine with the gift of incredible hindsight as if some great and powerful voice from two years in the future is telling them how to act.

This show is much worse than Studio 60 because it plays fast and loose with actual events, and lets all its characters shine with the gift of incredible hindsight as if some great and powerful voice from two years in the future is telling them how to act.

Where's the hardlined stance here? This show is, so far, crap, and the reviews have done a good job nailing why. Which really is the point of a review.

Where's the hardlined stance here? This show is, so far, crap, and the reviews have done a good job nailing why. Which really is the point of a review.

Obviously. The question from a dramatic point of view would be how much his desire to fire her would be overwhelmed by his sense that this is the right direction for the show. But by doing an episode that covers a 7 month period Sorkin kind of glosses over that key bit of character growth. So the implication is that…

Obviously. The question from a dramatic point of view would be how much his desire to fire her would be overwhelmed by his sense that this is the right direction for the show. But by doing an episode that covers a 7 month period Sorkin kind of glosses over that key bit of character growth. So the implication is that…

So, like, does Will not want to fire MacKenzie anymore? Cuz he said he'd wait a few months before he did it, and this episode is a few months later, and the fact that his corporate handlers hate his show would seem to be a great excuse for him to can her. Or is he actually proud of how the show turned out? 

So, like, does Will not want to fire MacKenzie anymore? Cuz he said he'd wait a few months before he did it, and this episode is a few months later, and the fact that his corporate handlers hate his show would seem to be a great excuse for him to can her. Or is he actually proud of how the show turned out? 

"Ruin his career" is a relative term because he'd still be rich, after years of a multimillion-dollar salary and what I assume would be a generous severance package. So if he never worked again I doubt he'd lose much sleep over it. But if he wanted to maintain his public persona he'd be sure to rake in millions…

"Ruin his career" is a relative term because he'd still be rich, after years of a multimillion-dollar salary and what I assume would be a generous severance package. So if he never worked again I doubt he'd lose much sleep over it. But if he wanted to maintain his public persona he'd be sure to rake in millions…

Or, it could have begun as a ploy to turn Jesse against Walter, and then Jesse kind of proved himself in Gus's eyes.