I don't think so, Ford mentioned to Bernard some episodes ago that mankind basically can heal every desease by now.

Rewatch the earlier episodes if possible, it's amazing how much foreshadowing/background goes over one's head the first time round.

Nicely put, but anyway it's easily explained away if the techs are hosts and Ford "asked them" to unconciously help Maeve.

No doubt Ford knows about Maeve, it was made clear multiple times that nothing in the park goes over his head.
Moreso, I think she's central to his "new storyline" and the "violent desires bring violet ends" quote is but a voice command to trigger other host for the storyline.

We see a black lady with an outfit similar to Maeve's in the background in one of William's scenes.
Guess it's save to say she was Maeve's predecessor.

Since Theresa's death was explained away as an accident, I fear it's Elsie 2.0 that the host printer in the secret basement lab is working on.

That leaves the question who the host-printer in the secret basement lab was working on.

Crack pot:
there is no new storyline.
Ford is just using it as an excuse to dig for something Arnold was hiding before he comitted suicide (probably with Dolores help, think "iRobot").

Nicely put.
So in a way we, the viewers are made to feel what Mavae and even more so Dolores experience.

Unless you watched the movie.
Time was not kind to neither Veronica nor Logan.

I feel you, but at this point simply confirming the "multiple points in time" theory is actually easier to believe than explaining away everything that points toward it.

That actually makes sense, at least as Ford's inspiration for the Wyatt storyline ("the best stories have a core of truth in them").
But literally Dolores=Wyatt? Nonononoo

Short answer:
Because ignoring them doesn't get your butt into the Oval Office

who - bonus!- has no idea how government actually works.
Which is about the only thing he has running for him.

Depends on the context, obviously:
https://www.rt.com/viral/36…
Nobody demonstrating against Trump can be unreasonable, or so I've been told.

Metallica?
Weren't those the guys that made a couple of good records and then killed Napster?

I got this reference, but oh boy I wish I didn't.

So?
Happens to me all the time.

Plus, this is minimum 50-60 years in the future.

I'm on the fence.
It makes sense in a way, but I hope they can neatly clear that up without confusing everyone the hell out.