The final image that It takes being Jay's father and her not wanting to tell them what it looks like lends credence to this particular variation on what I read as general sexual trauma themes, so kudos on picking up on that.

I want to apologize if invoking either of y'all and dragging you back into this argument bothered you at all, or might bring unwanted attention onto you, or anything else.

I don't know what else to tell you but that all the women in this thread, me, Scrawler, Mindy, are trying to tell you that they knew what they wanted and gave the decision exactly as much consideration as it needed.

That interpretation really doesn't make sense given what is presented in the episode. Do you think that couples inherently need to have extended discussion/conflict about such a thing? They're adults, they reached a decision reasonably and easily like people do all the time.

Besides how refreshing it is for women and their partners to see that experience portrayed, PB's first expressed opinion with the whole "We say what we want to do at the same time" thing is that he also wanted her to get an abortion, so. .

Sextina's complicated/mixed motivations aside, that moment rang true for me because it reflected my own experiences as a young hip hop fan who runs into that disconnect with talking to other people about it, our familiarity with certain hyperbolic comedic styles and taking on that same potentially flawed, "It's…

Overall themes, definitely, and the particular phrase I remember was that it reflected on the relationship between gems and humanity.

I've watched LFO three times now and while it has a lot of great stuff, between the Sorkin opener, the ending and the entire BoJack/PB argument with his devastating, very relatable monologue, it doesn't hang together or make me laugh as much* as the show usually does.

Oh, that. I know the connection there. I don't remember exactly when or how, but I'd already made it. Thanks for clarifying!

Maybe I'll regret this question, I certainly feel weird asking it, but where can I find the source of this lion's mane talk I've seen from you and others?

I can only hope that it lives up to We Need to Talk as far as flashback episodes go.

I'd put it at still in frustratingly ambiguous territory, I've never heard of Laramie as a name period, and I can't find anything on it either. The name change definitely puts further emphasis on and confirmation of identity issues, but they're still pretty vague at this point. I want to be clear that I'm a transwoman…

Sure, probably, I was just making the point that the majority of the time the CGs were around on earth was after Homeworld retreated.

They had been on earth post-rebellion for thousands of year, of course there were.

I really want them to actually keep this status quo change rather than lose all that money in one go. I'm not sure if the musical episode would be worth that tradeoff.

Next week? We have four more episodes this week!

Considering how much story they burned through in the first season, I don't see that happening.

What We Do in the Shadows was Number 25 on the list.

Trying to start up a whole new trilogy was a mistake. Go for a bold proper horror movie ending and send off for the whole series.

The delay on Schrab starting main work on the movie would likely also have to do with the two Lego movies already put into production for 2017 release, the Batman one and the Ninja one. The same Australia-New Zealand animation studio is producing both of those movies and Schrab's sequel, so it makes sense that they…