avclub-2d4195b6da6c06f3370980fe35d42291--disqus
rubato
avclub-2d4195b6da6c06f3370980fe35d42291--disqus

You just dropped by to give it a D? That's hilarious.

All her films seem to get great reviews, and then I watch them and they're like trying to swallow medicine. Except Wasp, that one is amazing.

I totally agree. Like Fallon should make up for the sweet ride Donald Trump has gotten for months from the media. What is working on Trump anyway? The distaste for Trump is pretty open in much of the more mainstream media and it might only be feeding into his narrative. Did he really have the magic interview that

Well, Hawaiian pizza has pineapple in it, so that's why I would get it…but yeah, I never get it.

You can say a lot in 30 minutes. I had no idea.

Silence of the Lambs was one of the scariest books I ever read, and I thought the film did it justice. I watched it last year and didn't think it held up that well. Hopkins' performance does, and so does the direction. But Foster is too mannered and there's something almost condescending in her towards her character

Like the author says, it's kind of weird to be commenting on a Canadian band not making it in the States, because there's a ton of Canadian musicians making it there right now.

I love Art of Tea. For awhile I listened to it incessantly, so if I hear anything from it now, it takes me right back there. At the time, it took me to some sophisticated place very far from my circumstances — to California, a playful guy, endless summer nights.

He's not villainous the way Mengele wasn't villainous. By that I mean, he is villainous.

The show did mention how the seasons work, I'm pretty sure.

Yes, I'm confused by that too. They've always played with the double entendre around that, so it's not a new meaning. At first it was referred to as a monetary debt, then the wrongs done to them, for several seasons now. But why is the reviewer talking about "now they must pay for the wrongs they've done to others"?

I loved this show, always made me laugh. I was surprised people weren't into it more.

Well, I'm not astute enough to note your petulance here. But I guess it came to mind because your review has this complaining tone that contrasts with the hugely ambitious scope of this episode's battle scenes. As such, it registers as petulant to me.

No, there's historic animosity there. I forget why, but it showed in the first time Tyrion came to Winterfell. Though I'm reaching back, he was friendly to everyone but Theon, as I recall.

Usually I love Myles McNutt's reviews about anything, but I've found him a challenge this season for this show. Turgid, obscure, bordering on incoherent, and even petulant. I mean, I do like a bit of a recap as well as the analysis.

What are you talking about, Ramsey's villainy wasn't as detailed in the books? Sure it was, to much more detail. They just compressed it and focused it on a couple of people in the show. That's a baffling point of view.

Thanks for clarifying the fake money thing. I found the bets confusing, since I don't picture AV writers as having a lot of disposable income.

Must be a reclamation item in there somewhere.

Did she get an Emmy yet? I'm watching season 3 on DVD and I really forget I'm watching the same actress. I really, really want to see her win and get a standing ovation.

I'm with those who don't want to see Lady Stoneheart, would rather live with the memory of Caitlyn.