"It’s absolutely hilarious, and well-worth more than one watch, just to catch each weird little intricacy."
"It’s absolutely hilarious, and well-worth more than one watch, just to catch each weird little intricacy."
Great but the headline said it was hilarious. Where is the hilarious part?
I didn't really see much in "Such a Gorgeous Kid…" just way too sloppy and silly. "Mississippi Mermaid" I liked, however.
And Gary Scott was potentially the greatest third baseman the Cubs ever had.
I always liked the actress who played Hank's wife. But alas:
http://www.californiamoves….
I've seen people argue about the top of the list but virtually everyone has the Sixth Doctor at the bottom.
Aren't any of you nerds going to rank the Doctors 1-11 for us?
I think it will end badly for Donald Glover.
Associating Jerry Lewis (especially) and Sid Caesar with “take-my-wife-please” bits is pretty ignorant on the reviewer's part.
I don't think so. The main complaints were that the book solely focused on the drug taking to the exclusion of everything else in Belushi's life. The veracity of the book hasn't been challenged.
People who look at the 1970s fondly didn't live through them.
For the $225M spent on this turd, Randolph Scott and Budd Boetticher could have made approximately 450 great westerns back in the 1950s.
No.
Logically.
Dick move, Corey.
The original didn't have the ridiculous ending. And it had Van Heflin and Glenn Ford.
Good rant but as usual with Posehn, not very funny.
Yes, when will he be writing about something relevant to the last two decades.
You mean you weren't enthralled by whether Clooney would sell his land to the evil developers at the end?
Skip the movie and listen to the audiobook of Coogan reading "I, Partridge:We Need to Talk About Alan" in character. Even if you generally have no use for audiobooks, its hilarious. Back of the net!