Who would be Luke? Starburns? Chang?
Who would be Luke? Starburns? Chang?
That header photo is nightmare fuel
I'm not surprised the show is only tenuously related to the film. It'd be difficult to sustain a show in which one of the principles was an authority abusing psychopath.
The Bush years were a practice run.
I'm probably easy to please but the Adam West voice-over hooked me.
I agree in principle but Trump has shown himself to be particularly vulnerable to mockery and satire. In this case, it's a practical weapon of resistance.
A thought I had the other day:
I'd say better than decent. I'd go so far as quite good.
David Lynch films tend to be very effective horror (even though they're rarely marketed or reviewed as such)
Early in production, they did some makeup tests because they wanted to show the demon that was possessing Regan. They weren't up to Friedkin's satisfaction so they were only used as subliminal quick flashes throughout the exorcism scenes.
Can I say that I'm not a fan of Melissa McCarthy here without getting savaged?
And tentacles have to be involved somehow
My brain read that as "Kid Rock stars in podcast about Elliot Smith" for a moment.
Predictably there is a shitload of Iron Maiden.
Stop making me support stuff I hate, you fucking assholes!
It's probably an overreaction but I hold them partly responsible for the mess we're in. Last season's false equivalency stuck in a lot of viewers' minds.
I think Cricket has bottomed out. It was fun in a horrifying IASIP way to watch his degradation but I'm not sure how much worse it can get. Of course, I say that but the show has repeatedly surprised me with just how far down the rabbit hole of depravity that they're willing to go
The ending of that film has stuck with me. I think it's very underrated.
I had very nearly forgotten about those films.
I kinda want to see cat Dee in a pose off with Mac's Nightman.