@avclub-32b63dd70d870580128d83e930199e1c:disqus I call being Actor!Iroh. "Choose Treschery, it's more fun!"

I'm pretty sure the article already stated the A.V. Club's own hand in the problem, but thanks for the fuel.

@avclub-11b8a5ce8c81cdb1f73003fb628d7bc6:disqus And I realized that you meant yourself after the fact.

You must explain who Minish is for me to laugh at your "Yes, Please!"/10.

I'm not, I just have a poor grasp of trigonometry. It was a tetrahedron, but it just moved back a side when he showed the Fifth Sense.

I was trying to come up with a flaw present in all of his works, and each of his works does have it's problems. It just comes down to how you weigh it in your mind.

I guess it just comes down to the execution. Don't forget though that moral ambiguity can lead to plot or character derailment when handled poorly.

@avclub-0ae1dd3954ee840075de1395771b6c9c:disqus While that is true, those are the kinds of villains that unravel shows the easiest. In those situations they have to make every protagonist worth caring about and their motives sympathetic. Darkseid is the closest to Ozai in example, whereas Aku is entertaing and Sauron…

This reminds me of the whole point of Ratatouille

I now have to use 'Churnalism' when it comes to news sites only interested in page views.

I'm trying to come up with a common criticism of his work, and….
Nothing. It's honestly ALL that good.

All I could think of are unknowns.
Especially for Ampersand.

I just have to add that you raise the idea of the Characters seeing the threats in the abstract, and that Book 3 goes to great lengths to humanize the threats to deepen our characters' dilemna. The downside to this is also exposing how shallow as a character our main villain, The Fire Lord, actually is. You have the…

Now if I were to put on a play of "The Boy in the Iceburg" and put actors dressed like the real characters in the Audience to comment on the Play, does that make it Outside-Meta Commentary?

All I have to contribute is that it makes it more apparant that they want to focus on the Core group a lot more by removing all of the recurring characters (and Chit Sang) at the Beginning of the Southern Raiders. I always start wondering how the ending would be different if they had managed to stick together. Maybe…

We get enough members of the Fanbase to commit and I'll coordinate it myself. And actors as the Real Gaang in the audience would be awesome.

Now if he'd kindly review the Finale with a large amount of analysis and discussion starters.

Was that a tetrahedron? I thought it was a 4 sided pyramid.

Anybody Else completely confused about what the theme was until the Narrator told us?
And I thought they'd cut him off before he could say it too.

"Met" you mean…
Don't worry, I shall fade into obscurity for know. But know this, I Will Be Reborn into another guise.
There are those out there who know that it's not wrong, but RIGHT. OH SO RIGHT. And I thought you would understand Firecest.