No, the person who wins only deserves to win if they are voted for. Amber, Natalie, Fabio and Sandra (the 2nd time), just to name a few, all won because the jury voted against the person who played the best game and they lucked out to be there at the end. If the jury votes for you, you deserve to win. If they vote…

It seems pretty clear from all the talk on the Ponderosa videos that Kim is making all the decisions and the jury knows that.

The only way I can see Kim losing now is if Chelsea or Sabrina wins the final 4 immunity challenge and even then it will be an undeserved loss due to a bitter jury.

I felt like he was trying to talk like Alicia.

According to the Ponderosa videos she was reacting to Kim and that was just editing. This episode had a lot of weird editing between that and Chelsea being shown with clean hair in a confessional at the very start of the episode.

Did Stephen really have a good opportunity to turn though? JT won so many of the late immunity challenges that even if he planned to take JT out he never got the chance. Stephen has said he wanted to take JT out before the final 2 and I believe him. He just never got the chance to prove it. That's why you need at…

I think Dan from Nicaragua may have given her competition though. He was #5 in a final 3 (so basically the equal of a #4 in a final 2) and completed the game having made no strategic moves, having no idea what was happening at each tribal council and lacking the ability to even complete most of the challenges.

I think she has to get rid of Sabrina but you're right in that if she brings Chelsea to the end she can say definitively that she was truly loyal to Chelsea and was the one making all the calls. She just needs to make sure the 3rd person is a massive goat.

I think Troy, Jonas and Jay will vote for Kim out of respect. I was iffy on Jay until tonight when he was talking to Kat about getting blindsided in Ponderosa. You could just feel how annoyed he was at her and I suspect that lack of respect for her will extend to the other players he perceives as stupid.

I think you hit what the Glee writers are trying to do right on the head but just because they aren't aiming to be great doesn't mean they should get away with being terrible. If we don't tell Ryan Murphy and FOX that Glee is terrible then you're just going to get more shows like Glee.

I'm 3 episodes behind now but I think Todd's F may drag me back in. I stopped watching, not because it got bad, but because it got boring. Spectacularly bad Glee is the Glee for me.

@—- I'm pretty sure Todd even listed a miscarriage as his least favourite event that could happen in a tv show on his podcast.

Seriously? I mean I enjoyed watching Penner but he's the last guy I would have wanted back for his looks.

He was the 3rd guy who was mentioned as returning apparently.

I liked this, it seems like the show is basically going to be It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia on Network TV and I for one am on board.

This (http://www.realityblurred.c… ) article is where I heard it. A lot of the information adds up.

If you go to CBS.com and watch the Ponderosa videos you can see what they do after they get voted out. Basically they're allowed to say anything to each other and often jury members will actually campaign for (or against) one of the players left in the game.

From what I've heard it will be injured players: Michael Skupin, Russell Swan and someone else.

Didn't you see that Tarzan was the 2nd person that they would trust their lives with? He's just getting a shitty edit and is a little weird. Tarzan's going to the final 3 because he screwed over the guys to get there. Whether he wins just depends on how bitter they are towards him and Kim.

Tarzan isn't next, he's going to the final 3.