avclub-17e505346d7f670dced5d85e72f32ab2--disqus
Ergoat
avclub-17e505346d7f670dced5d85e72f32ab2--disqus

Jeezus fucking christ, are you one of those "I don't know about the war in Iraq (I mean, guess they might have WMDs), but I sure would like to have a beer with GW Bush" kind of person?

"(The show was cancelled prior to 9/11, but Parker has said the attacks
would have forced cancellation regardless because of the political mood.)"

I agree, he was very biased of his treatment of Abolitionists. The Civil War should have allotted more time to give voice to the rights of slave-owners. jfc…

Glad to see I wasn't the only one who saw the comparison, and congrats for beating me to the punch.

Nader didn't cause Gore to run such an uninspiring campaign that he losst his home state.

Nader in no way lost the election for Gore. Gore stopped his own party from demanding the recount (which he won) or investigating the 1000s of black people that were denied their voting rights. (and more examples.) So, yeah STFU with your anti-3rd party propaganda.

Maybe war criminals deserve to be dragged through the mud? Just a thought.

How many more election cycles are you going to be duped by "The Lesser of Two Evils" propaganda? Honest question.

Maybe, just maybe more popular because the DNC managed to put on the fewest debates for a primary ever, scheduling the mere few when no one was watching. Or is it conspiring with the Obama DoJ to wait until after the election to fully investigate the email scandal where Clinton was planning drone strikes? Or that a

Not a Sanders supporter (you could say I'm to the easily to the left of a New Deal-Lite Democrat like Bernie) but it really is a shame that Samantha Bee took her show that previously had some nice hard hitting segments, wasn't encumbered by interviewing celebrities like TDS's 3rd act, and turned it into a Hillary

All I'm trying to do is help you understand that The Name of the Rose is merely a blip on an otherwise uninterrupted downward trajectory.

"We have porn. So much porn. But it's not the kind you like, and there's too much story and makeup. No money shots, and you can't fast forward. We're all so alone in this world."

If X3 wasn't such a garbage fire I think they could have somehow given Rogue her superpowers while still playing up her angle in the "Cure" storyline; about how she can touch or be intimate with people. But we got a half-rate version of the Morlocks that had Callista with powers she never had (super-speed &

They can create a female "Angel" who's a go-go dancer with dragonfly wings and can shoot mini-fireballs from her mouth, recon Kitty Pryde into have time traveling abilities, but can't think of a way to give Rogue her superpowers? C'mon…

Huh? Origins wasn't even close to the tone of the Wolverine/Weapon X stories of the late 80s/early 90s. (I have no comment about the clusterfuck after Wolverine lost his adamantium…)
That the ~5 minutes of Weapon X in X-Men Apocalypse got so much more right than the entirety of Origins says a lot about how that movie

I really really liked Days of Future Past but it is a distant 3rd to "nailing the tone" of that story. It only spent about 2 minutes on fleshing out the horrors of the dystopian hellscape future, something that the original comic two parter (obviously) and X-Men TAS did better.

I remember that line on opening day in a packed theater.
"Do you know what happens to a toad when it is struck by lightning?"
[Entire audience leans forward in anticipation: this is going to be AWESOME!]
[Halle Berry in an emotionless tone with a fucking stupid accent that added nothing to her character] "The same thing

Having Rogue in four films and never having her character have the powers of flight and super strength (IE Rogue) was rather retarded. Now that I think of it, it was probably the machinations of Halle Berry who didn't want a strong female lead competing with her. Which adds to my theory that everything that is wrong

I think X-Men: Apocalypse is the best installment so far, because it allowed the X-Men finally to be X-Men; not afraid to have fantastical creatures exist in a ~realistic world. All previous entries were kind of apologetic to this notion, and overcompensated with unnecessary gritty-realism and origin stories to mask

Ralph Nader had NOTHING to do with Al Gore losing. Gore ran such an lousy, uninspiring campaign he couldn't even win his home state, but when it came to the Florida debacle, Gore won the majority of the votes by any and every count. Gore then went on to stop his own party members in Congress from challenging the