avclub-173af0430bc192b8a027af7cdba82cd7--disqus
Tom S
avclub-173af0430bc192b8a027af7cdba82cd7--disqus

that sounds like an archetypical capitalist, to me

in an odd way, i appreciate that trump has now made himself both an emblem of an 80ish conception of manhood and success and an emblem of a movement of racist reactionary idiots. it was there all along, but now he's added flashing neon signs for the slow readers

Yeah, there's a pretty sizable distinction between 'said bad things about the president' and 'actively promoted an explicitly racist argument that the president was a fake'- it's the equivalent of a super vocal Truther getting a reality show, which I imagine is unlikely.

says a dude called 'shitegeist'

'but' implies some sort of contradiction or disagreement between clauses

A surprisingly different film from 1973's blaxploitation classic, 'Hoe, Mo' Sexual Acts!"

nincompoop?

in my head it was more tim burtoney and less 'that dude wants to fuck a corpse'

wow i did not recall that video being so necrophilia oriented

Is there any face more recognizable than Tom Colicchio?

a sexual what?

polanski?

i think to some degree it's hard to fit deranged sex criminals into normative categories of gay and straight, but i think dahmer fits 'gay' about as well as a ted bundy fits 'straight'

not me! my skin is discolored and i haven't had a bowel movement in months, but god dammit if I'm not the friendliest guy in town

capoeria is totally silly, but it's also cool as hell and a thing i am glad exists on this dumb earth

well, a lone, passionate auteur whose brain is devoted 100% to marketing, anyway

a.) that seems like a fairly glib analysis of that situation, as though there were no other way to get those children vitamin a and as though creating the crop automatically means it will make it to where it is needed and b.) i'm not actually against gmos in and of themselves, i merely believe that they are the locus

he definitely is funding orphanages and unemployment and stuff in b:tas, but the show is never too interested in the bruce wayne end of the equation

he does, though? usually there's all sorts of positive things the wayne billions are funding. i guess things are either a.) actually way better than they used to be (which means that gotham must have been one hell of a place pre bats) or b.) everything's so corrupt the money's not getting to where it should be

they all feel like the same movie with different actors in a way his hong kong movies never ever do- there's a plasticky quality to them, and you could literally cut shots out from the big shoot out at the end of MI:2 and put them into face/off with nobody noticing.