avclub-15037e2695ec8b4820f9346d067edf39--disqus
The Devil and John Berryman
avclub-15037e2695ec8b4820f9346d067edf39--disqus

That was a great joke, because the target wasn't Wallis, but rather the the fickle culture that turns on actresses immediately. Like how all of a sudden everyone was supposed to love Jennifer Lawrence and hate Natalie Portman. But everyone saw the C word and stopped thinking.

And conservatives would be demanding the offender's free speech not be stampeded.

Like they have a fucking clue what an adjective is.

The AV Club never has and never will post anything about Donald Trump. Anything you see to the contrary is a lie.

No one here is attacking a kid. Everyone is either completely rejecting the idea of attacking a kid, and some, like me, find the overblown response a bit hypercritical, but are still condemning the tweet itself.

I thought it was an indictment over our absurd gun laws, and how family members are exponentially at greater risk to be the victims of violence just by being in the same home as a weapon.

If we really want to flip things upside down, liberals need to start a GoFundMe to help this poor, innocent defender of free speech. And also give her her own reality show on…what's the liberal version of TLC? Bravo? Let's go with Bravo.

The tweet was bad, full stop. She should not have said it. But, at the same time, the right does not ever get to complain about decency or the need to be careful with language, and they definitely don't get to say any of that about comments made on Twitter. Both can be true.

I'm not saying we should be attacking a kid, but fighting him on policy won't do shit. We tried that for months, and all he did was tweet and say the most offensive shit imaginable. I don't know what the solution is, but being policy wonks certainly ain't it.

So we're clear, you're upset over the language in a tweet, and also upset that the AV Club is censoring language?

If Katie Rich were running for President it would probably be a bigger deal. As is, her one unfortunate joke on Twitter, compared the years long history of hate on Twitter from the President and his high profile supporters, is pretty inconsequential. Especially when the President won primarily by being the "saying it

Also attached to it will be a rider requiring grade school children to carry automatic weapons in school.

You know that one of those kids is going to be a black sheep, and end up as a halfway decent person. But my money is on Tiffany. She just has to fucking hate her sister.

I thought the joke was that Barron is John Connor and he's been sent to the past to save the world.

Shit all over him? Jesus, you ghoul, leave Donald's sexual deviances out of discussions of his children.

These snowflakes need to lighten up and learn how to take a joke. Freedom of speech!

This is, of course, completely accurate. The kid is out of bounds. HOWEVER, the people all up in arms over a Twitter joke are…umm…just a tiny bit hilariously hypercritical.

Freedom.

Fake news. There is one tiny corner of my house that works for calls if you put it on speaker and hold your hand in the air. Stop lying.

I used to working for a marketing agency, and if we ever pitched to build a campaign around being "almost as good as our competitor!" we would have been fired on the spot.