I do want to say that I'm touched by how this decision is bringing former enemies together. I'm seeing trolls upvote regulars, liberals upvote conservatives…

Luckily, I was too big to fit! —Runs off and eats a whole pie while weeping—

I'm suggesting that as a negative because I graduated from junior high school several decades ago and have no interest in repeating the experience.

Sorry, went right over my head!

Yes, and thanks for the comment, I was specifically thinking about you and some other people who are well-known here when I said "that's not a knock on long-time commenters and parody accounts who are valued here,"

Yep. It also basically means that actual moderators who understand and attempt to implement the rules fairly won't be a factor — instead, you can have that decided by online cliques!

The issue with that is that several of us have Disqus accounts AND our legacy AV Club ones. I never wanted my comments here tied into my public life.

Of course it does, to a certain extent, as it would anywhere people gather in groups, but peoples comments being visible isn't literally dependent on community approval as it is on Kinja.

I'm sorry, I thought it was implied that I was referring to the Kinja sites I sometimes find myself on.

Yes, you're absolutely right…I always wind up clicking on things that I think are responses and then having to spend minutes searching for what I thought I was responding to in the first place.

Aye!

The simple fact of the matter is that the reason I read articles here, in particular recaps, and participate in the conversations I am interested in is because this is basically a democratic platform that allows me to pick and choose what I'm interested in talking about without feeling like I have to be part of some…

Absolutely nothing said about the system valuing the comments of "popular" kids and hiding those of people who don't spend their lives forming bonds with strangers on the Internet.

You're missing the point. The actual shot shows both Ed and his reflection doing entirely different things, which means, A. Reality genuinely doesn't work as we thought and they just filmed it as is, or B. A reflection was superimposed over the window and this wasn't done in-camera. So if we're both assuming B., that…

I must have misunderstood then. My apologies.

Yep. Maybe read the interview with her where she makes her motives extremely clear before you do the knee-jerk "he said something againsst an X, therefore he's an Xphobe shtick."

But how do you know it's the last line?

But presuming the same isn't the case for Janey-E, it doesn't change the fact that she fell in love with the golem in the first place and it doesn't mean her affections would readily transfer to an entirely different person.

I don't think there's anything wrong with reinterpreting authorial intent when the original work still stands. People drawing mustaches on the Mona Lisa don't replace the Mona Lisa.

I could be. On the Internet nobody know. But the actor is literally not a little person. He has suffered from severe arthritis since childhood which is why is neck is unable to support his head.