I've seen it and you are 100% correct. This is a Disney movie animated by Pixar, nothing more. It's not bad, per se, but 20 years from now nobody is going to be calling this a Pixar classic.

Well, you're in luck because it is half-decent.

Well, you're in luck because it is half-decent.

I've seen it, and the reason for you being stunned is justified. Just look at the pedigree of the multiple credited directors and multiple writers. They are not from the Pixar stable. Cars 2 was the only other Pixar film that any of them so much as breathed on.

I've seen it, and the reason for you being stunned is justified. Just look at the pedigree of the multiple credited directors and multiple writers. They are not from the Pixar stable. Cars 2 was the only other Pixar film that any of them so much as breathed on.

Although the Hays Code was not formally adopted until the early 30's (and it was actually an amalgam of his recommendations and others), he was hired by the studios in 1922 to help deal with the state censorship boards that were beginning to crop up. By 1924 he had a list of recommendations the studios would abide by.…

Surely there are enough Republicans in San Diego to warrant a visit? What is up with that?

It is a hard PG-13 but the story doesn't really call for wall-to-wall blood. It's not a revenge story, it's a justice movie.

Note that this is NOT a remake, it's a movie based on the book as source material, not the original movie.

It's not tame. Honestly, when I saw it last week I didn't know it was PG-13, I figured it was R when I walked out. It certainly pushes the limits of PG-13, perhaps because the language is not harsh, at least in today's terms, so they blew their wad on the violence and blood.