I hope Porsche quits. With no Porsche LMP1 fails. If LMP1 fails WEC has to rethink things. Then maybe we get a return of a class that runs Hypercars like the P1, LaFerrari, 918, Konigsegg, Pagani, etc.

Dammit.

I have the “Live in Cuba” dvd. Such an amazing concert. When Audioslave formed I was one of those super bummed people who had been holding out hope that Rage was going to get their shit together. I was a fan of Soundgarden and even Temple of the Dog which I discovered after Pear Jam exploded. But when I heard Chris…

I just want to go on record to say that Cornell’s work with Audioslave is by far some of his best songs. It was an impressive mix of self-reflection and philosophy and really highlighted Chris’s impressive vocal range.

Let’s just address price. This car was designed as a no compromise race car FIRST. Homologated road car second. The price is indicative of that. Goal one was to win class at Le Mans. The car they ended up with while doing that is the one they’ve homologated into a road car that just happens to cost half a million…

Let’s let cooler heads prevail and think things through. Yes it is true, there was a change of equipment. The original plane was a CRJ-900 and a CRJ-700 was substituted. Whether it was due to the original plane “going tech” aka mechanical issue that did not permit the plane to legally fly under FAA regs or a…

I never made any claims to the level of training of the gate agent or their knowledge of FARs. Yes it is incorrect that child seats are not permitted. That is besides the point, the child should not have been in that seat anyway because the ticket was invalid when their son was a no-show.

You went straight to the FUCKING HOLOCAUST over bad customer service. Maybe take a step back, you’ve lost the argument.

Infants can’t be in car seats without a ticket. Because the child is flying “infant in arms,” the child doesn’t have a reserved seat. It’s really a simple concept, want seat, buy ticket.  

Funny thing is, I read the contracts I agree to, and if I don’t, that’s on me. I’m a responsible adult capable of telling the difference between making an error and “getting fucked.”

I know it’s trendy to jump on airlines for every little slight and the airlines do make themselves to be a very attractive target. At the same time, folks needs to understand why things are the way they are. When I flew over 200 segments and 200,000 miles a year, I spent a lot of time speaking with airline personnel…

Hello false equivalence.

Sadly, yes, this is correct. 18 year doesn’t show up, that seat goes to someone else.

Except in this case the recollection of the rule was right. By the rule he agreed to the ticket was non-transferrable. Shitty as it may be delta didn’t mess that part of it up.

One, the rules are primarily in place to prevent terrorists from using assumed identities. Two, since his 18-year-old son did not check-in, he was a “no-show” and essentially relinquished his “paid-for” seat. Three, this was apparently a sold-out flight, and some adult had paid for and expecting to use that seat. …

He did have a seat on that flight, the problem is it was in the older child’s name, not the younger child’s name.

He should have bought a seat on that flight. What was he going to do if the flight he was on was full? It also seems like a pain in the ass for the flight attendant (and the rest of the passengers) to have to delay take-off so they can go and check to make sure that someone hadn’t used the ticket on the other flight.