auntida
AuntIda
auntida

Hamas obviously should have known that their brutal, evil killing spree on 10/7 would result in swift and forceful retaliation by the Israelis. Why Hamas chooses to intermingle military and civilian sites, hospitals with war rooms, schools with rocket launcher battalions, etc, we will never understand. Other than to

Yes, we all know how Hamas are champions for women's rights...

A lot of women HERE undergo c-sections with no anesthesia. If it’s an actual emergency or too late in the delivery process, that’s normal.

Exactly, her behavior is not presented as a good thing or something to emulate, it’s over the top awfulness.

I don’t understand that either. For the most part, the Bluth’s are reprehensible people. We are laughing at them. Lucille’s outrageous behavior, in an expert deadpan by Jessica Walter, is to be mocked by the audience. These characters are funny and a lot of the humor comes from their general unlikability.

Did we miss that Lucille is not meant to be a sympathetic character, and that calling them dramatic and flamboyant (while being dramatic and flamboyant) is not meant to be an endorsement of being horrible?

She’s referring to a boat of gay protestors that she worries will upstage her husband’s party. (Maybe not everything on the show has aged well.)“

Maybe not everything on the show has aged well.

The 2004 versions was okay but yeah the 1979 one is fucking amazing. And for a TV movie(mini-series, I can’t remember if it was 2 parts back in 79 as I was 6) it’s top tier. 

Now playing

As with the Wicker Man, in what world is a remake ever going to be 10% as good as the original? And certainly not as scary. As I’ve mentioned on other related threads, after the 1979 Salem’s Lot was shown on UK television, it was the subject of a letter sent in to a show called Points of View which aired around 8pm.

Did they make it a period piece set back in the 1970s? Because it kind of doesn’t work as well in modern times - harder to believe that a town could get taken over by vampires and effectively disappear without it attracting a ton of attention from outside. 

If you need to subject yourself to a mental health crisis you are unable to handle because of YOUR method, then your method is problematic and unhealthy. Other actors have no issues getting the same results without subjecting themselves to anguish. We should therefore reevaluate method acting’s place in the

Your employer isn’t your friend.

And if you feel what you are acting so hard, maybe it’s not the right job for you.

So.... she is in a profession where she plays various roles. Some of those characters she plays may face adversity in their stories. If that is something that crosses into her personal view of herself, she should not be in that profession.

The contract work you took with a production company and then is shown on a streaming platform typically doesn’t involve mental health counseling you decided you needed after the production was completed. 

“I am shocked, simply shocked, that in an industry full of self-absorbed narcissists, NONE OF THEM reached out to ME!”

A working place is not a replacement for a therapy group. She was lucky to get work as an actress. Problematic to blame Netflix and Shondaland for her mental problems she obviously had before because

If pretending to be a different person makes you take on the mental health anguish of that character you have no business being an actor. Your employer is not responsible for your mental health. Your mental health is your responsibility. You can’t blame others for engaging with work that you know has the capacity to

Which workplaces are good with supporting employees who have psychotic breaks?

She may be in for a bit of a shock with her next employer.