audiaudi0x3nfree
AudiAudiOxenFree
audiaudi0x3nfree

Lol seriously, it’s adding so much dimension to the characters. People change. Even Darth Vader. “It’s too late for me” sets up fucking everything!

“According to a study by the Center for Automotive Research the GM bailout saved 1.2 million jobs and preserved $34.9 billion in tax revenue.”

My understanding is that you will run into two different schools of thought on which is best. Personally if it was me, I’d grab the 2.2 even though it doesn’t rev to 9000, it also doesn’t sound like dying animals (as much). I’d say I’ve driven both, but the early model one I drove had a 70mm turbo and made 490 at the

Look at the (I’m assuming) G37 in the top article picture. Does that look unsafe to you? Of course not. That is a “stanced” car with stretched tires.

Nice use of a meme, I guess. By PSI I didn’t mean inside of the tire. Obviously, if the mass of the car doesn’t change, and the size of the contact patch decreases, the PSI of the contact patch increase. That is how that works.

OOOOooooo you’re not going to ungrey me (I don’t even know what that means anyways). That’s such believable news to me, thanks for sharing, very worthwhile information.

I’m the tough guy when on every single one of these these posts there 50+ going derr it’s dangerous just because they don’t like something? I don’t even like stanced cars, I think they look terrible. I notice how you still don’t have a good answer, and have to resort to calling me a bully, oddly.

The fact of the

Congraturlations! you’re literally the first person to give a decent answer!

oh yeah, im sure this happens all the time to everyone. Of course there can be failures, considering the fact that that rim doesn’t even have ANY damage on it, I doubt very much it was much of a problem. Get fucking serious man, there are a lot bigger problems on the road than stretched tires. Also, you’re name is

Lol, I was just at H20i, I can guarantee you there were more airbaged or coil-over cars than there were cut springs — most people don;t have access to oxi torches either, espciall when a set of HRs are $150.... Of course cut springs are not smart, they change the spring rate and handling characteristics, but also

Lower contact patch area also increases PSI, which would increase both dynamic co-efficient of friction, and the static one in wet situations.

Perfect non-answer. Good try, internet safety guy.

Hahaha, look at my response to the other guy. So the the tires aren’t designed to be used as tires? So they will ware faster on one side. So what? The patch contacting the road is still the tread. Who cares if people want to wear their tires more unevenly.

You have no fucking idea, do you? You just don’t like them and are assuming they are unsafe. At best, you’re going to come back and say something about sidewalls, with no real explanations, or no real data on increased crashes. And for the record, I hate stanced cars.

This is my problem with over-lowering B5 S4s, the gap becomes a weird elliptical shape that looks worse than gap in the first place.

In B4 people saying how stanced out cars are dangerous without any explanation at all of how they are so. Also, saying “derp it stresses suspension components or something” is not a valid answer. Camber plates and airbags are not in any way dangerous or component-stressing.

And please explain to us why they are unsafe, o’tire expert.

Good luck!

wait wait wait... what if... you took the Bships, but made them shorter, like 509 ft long. And took off their guns. And adapted them for missile defense. And gave them extremely complex radar systems... what about then?!

I laughed way too hard at this.