God damn pollens!

I too was not impressed by the 3. They talk about them all the time on Jalopnik as being better thna a civic or corolla, not really sure why.

lol, because the one’s 10 years ago weren’t as good! I always though conceptually a CVT was the best thing ever. Glad to hear they are getting there.

I saw this happen at Watkins Glenn with C6 Zr1s... not sure why there was such a surprise here when C7s did the exact same thing...

I don’t know what that is.

Whatever you say, comrade.

I always wanted to buy an ultralight airplane, you know, like one of those things thats basically a lawn chair with a snowmobile engine/hang glider attached to it, and go goose hunting with it — in the air. Then my father explained why it was illegal :(

be careful what you wishfor...

Right, my point is this; it’s not inherently dangerous. Driving dangerously is always dangerous; just because a car is lowered, static or not, does not mean it’s going to fly off the road and kill people, it does not mean the suspension is compromised, it does not mean the car is any more dangerous than a 1999 grand…

I was there. Never saw that once the entire weekend. You know it was literally a hurricane right? 60mph winds and rain the entire time. These car were abel to operate in that weather just fine. Also, very few reallly low cars are static, almost all are on airbags and there fore adjustable on the fly. This is exactly…

lol, how are they not safe? I hate stances cars as much as anyone, but the “dey ain’t safe” argument is just dumb. They have increased tire wear? They’re driving down a tourist strip at 15 mph.... relax officer safety.

He has no explaination, he just hates stanced cars so he’s jumping on the karma bandwagon to look morally superior. Interestingly, nearly 100% of police Tahoes are lowered, sometime up to 4 inches.

lol, how are they not safe? I hate stances cars as much as anyone, but the “dey ain’t safe” argument is just dumb. They have increased tire wear? They’re driving down a tourist strip at 15 mph.... relax officer safety.

lol, how are they not safe? I hate stances cars as much as anyone, but the “dey ain’t safe” argument is just dumb. They have increased tire wear? They’re driving down a tourist strip at 15 mph.... relax officer safety.

the S4 premium (at this writing, Audi would acknowledge only a “mid-$40s” starting point) will have 339 horsepower and 302 pound-feet of torque underfoot, compared with 250 and 258 for the 2.7-liter twin-turbo V-6 used in the previous S4. Which ought to add up to some pretty serious go, right? Ought to. But Audi’s…

Lol, even the best “test” numbers I’ve seen for a B6 S4 put it at about 5.6 sec 0-60. But I’ve driven at least a half dozen of them. They are slow. I don’t mean, “fast, but not as fast as I would have thought”, I don’t mean “kinda fast”, I mean they are downright, doggidly slow. You push the accelerator when you’re…

lolololol, you’ve obviously never driven a B6/7 S4... its actually what the question asked... and I’m a huge audi fan.

How is the B6/7 S4 not on here...?

my comany wouldn’t buy teslas when impalas could do. Stupid argument is stupid. I didn;t even read your post past that.

What’s the F15’s combat record? 115 to 0? Did you know we operate over 2,500 F15/16/18s? Yeah that’ll do. We don’t need more F22s.

Heh. Interesting. Thanks for the insight.