asynonymous1
Alcoholic Synonymous
asynonymous1

Dude’s too busy driving tanks to waste time on silly things like editing. Give him a break. His job is way cooler than yours.

DMC, McLaren. Pretty sure those letters are in the same order..

Oh my God - you’re being That Guy™.

“What? I did this for fun, those poor fuckers do it for survival and they aren’t very good at it ”

Dude, it’s obviously the driver trying to justify his actions

I’ve raced FWD DSM’s on dirt for years. It’s safe to say I have experienced oversteer in a FWD. I just wouldn’t consider oversteer in a FWD as actual “drifting” nor could you ever label a FWD car a “drift car.”

The 4.0 uses a timing chain I believe.

Don’t shy away just because the ad is terrible (e.g. “Car for Sale”). Sometimes these ads suck because the seller can’t use technology. A buddy of mine scored a sweet aluminum Lund fishing boat, outboard motor, trolling motor, fish finder, overall very good condition, and on a trailer (kind of a given) for next to

My favorite ads are “Car for Sale” and the ad simply states “nice car for sale. $1000.”

It’s right next to where assaults rifles are mentioned?

He means fifth amendment protection against self-incrimination. He doesn’t want to spell it out, because, obviously, it makes the cops kinda look bad.

It must be in there somewhere, because the Constitution is a perfect document that anticipates everything (not a living document or some other librul hogwash). It’s probably in the same part where black people only count as 3/5s of a person.

This is my pet peeve as well. This isn’t the old days when you paid by-the-word for a classified ad. Tell me the good and the bad and provide pictures to document. Broken side mirror? Take a pic. Ripped front seat? Take a pic.

It “violates” an officers right to publish images of themselves under the first amendment! Perhaps an officer doesn’t want their own image published! /s

Yeah those ads are hilarious, especially if it says something like “$600 nice car no rust motor gone”

Yeah -- where’s the constitutional right to not be transparent when working in government? If conservatives really cared about constitutional rights, they’d be up in arms every time a police union threatens not to work a football game because a few players spoke out against police... that’s a naked effort to chill

Car for sale. Runs good. Needs nothing

“Plz buy car. Between zero and five tires included. Cock does not go in duck. Have nice day.”

Oh im not arguing that, but with no rear wheel camber at all and torque heavy FWD it would still do better than a Civic. I dont drift, i hate breaking traction personally, but its pretty clear that was someone in japans air brain thought process.

“...point out in the Constitution where body cameras are mentioned.”