A retro-virus? A retrovirus is a type of virus. It’s not a thing that fights viruses, unless it’s a vaccine against a retrovirus made from a retrovirus.

Dogs of the Soul Crusher, pulling you closer, like the blue steel jaws of Hell.  

The end of net neutrality means that upstream providers can strangle the small ISPs out of existence.  So, well, enjoy your non-monopolist ISP while you can.  

A 9 year old drew that? Kid has potential.

Well, they do need the non-white poors, too. Just there has to be more white ones who can be convinced they are on the same side as rich whites, in order to keep the others in their place.

And this is chief among the reasons I hate Harleys and their riders.  Loud Pipes Wake Babies.  

It’s not bad, for a kid’s movie. I never saw the first two.  Maybe if it’s on TV or Netflix or something.  I first saw it on a plane.  

Elijah Wood isn’t in it for very long, but he gets the funniest moment in the whole thing. 

One less thing to break.

Also, buy the NA economy cars, too.  You don’t actually need the extra power.

Why would that make you want to kill yourself?

It is hell.

I had a sister with a condition not unlike the scarier end of Zika. It was horrifying, it destroyed my mother, and the end was a relief. I wouldn’t wish either the condition or caring for a child with it on anyone EXCEPT a conservative politician.

Baby boomers can’t die fast enough.

If you think he’s a pseudo capitalist you must be operating under a right wing propaganda definition of capitalism.

Wow, I thought the end of net neutrality would be my only reason to say this today:

Paul Ryan has 14 words for you.

I meant to the kids in that movie. He was a grown man at that point.

South park is garbage, libertarian as you are using it is a meaningless term (George Carlin, conservative?), and only the current political meaning (it’s been taken over almost completely by ancap shitlords) even makes sense to include in the conservative movement. You are using the term from sometime around 1985.

A communist AP, I presume.

Why do they say it is bad? Is it some variant of “it’s like the fairness doctrine” and thinking they are opposing the impending imposition of neutrality?

Welcome to China, America.