Personally, I blame the portion of Bernie Sanders' followers who thought Clinton and Trump were the same and that it was okay to vote for Stein or skip the elections altogether this year. Clinton was never close to be THAT bad. Never close.

WB's superhero movies have so many problems, it's hard to list them all. The studio realized too late they were sitting on a gold mine with all their DC superheroes, so they tried to overcompensate by making their movies too fast with no sense of direction.

1- I'm not impressed with Mack and Coulson's ability to keep Agnes safe. You have her as a bait for someone who works with a terrorist organization and you're that far from her when Radcliffe arrives?

I love Kristen Stewart. In an era where the President is obsessed by his image, there's something endearing about an actress that deals with her celebrity so awkwardly.

I thought it was so-so. I wasn't sold on Vanessa Hudgens' character and the company doesn't look nearly as wacky as Better Off Ted. I'm not sure Powerless will ever survive the comparison between both shows, even with the added "spot the DC Comics reference" dimension.

This show is more an underdog than I feel it should be. Pudi and Tudyk have done great work on cult TV shows but they won't bring a lot of viewers on their own. They need a recognizable name as their lead but who they have - Hudgens - is an actress whose fanbase isn't the same as the audience targeted by Powerless.…

People just don't know how to criticize on the Internet. I'm serious. They always go too far. It's as if the concept of proportion was completely foreign to them.

Why would anyone believe Page Six? Is that really a credible source?

Honestly, instead of writing their name on a website no one will read, people should just tweet to him directly. Flooding his twitter account is ruining the only thing we know for sure he loves of true love.

Does anyone believe in the rule of law anymore? I know it's not perfect. It's often wrong, and for the wrong reasons, but it's still the best system we have to judge whether someone is guilty or not. The answer to "is this a sex crime?"should not determine whether someone has the right to the presumption of innocence…

If everyone is missing the meaning of your joke, you screwed up. Also, attacking someone through his kid is a low blow, even if the target is a piece of human garbage with a toupet on top. Kids are just off limit. Period.

There are so many Trumps to make fun of, I really don't understand the need to pick on Barron.

I have seen Damages and yes, it was a complicated, layered villain. As I said, My concerns have nothing to do with Danson's skills. Playing a human villain in a lawyer show is different than playing a demon in a comedy.

I have mixed feelings about the finale.

There's a few developments I didn't like last night.

Don't get too excited: the idea of a wookie ripping off somebody's arm still came from A New Hope.

The film may have succeeded at what it was trying to do but that doesn't make me enjoy the it more.

I never cared all that much for that film. The story within a story structure always threw me off; always felt to me like it was a way for the film to give itself a good review. Plus, I like the secondary characters but I find the two leads pretty bland.

Normally, according to every sci-fi movies/TV shows/games I've seen/played, a computer would contain all the infos that Janet knows and would take care of displaying Janet where she is needed. The hologram itself would be dependant of that computer and that computer would still presumably attached to that killswitch.

Another apparent hole in logic: having her hologram on the train should not prevent Janet from being rebooted. Or murdered.