“an even bigger prize”
“an even bigger prize”
Wow. She was probably calculating how much time she was wasting even as she was saying yes.
This has my abuse flags popping all the fuck up. This is a textbook narcissistic thing to do - something “nice” that’s “for” someone else, but executed in a way that absolutely steals focus from her, derails a legitimate accomplishment she’s worked very hard for, all while maintaining this air of plausible deniability…
Back in the day, Slate used to have the Double XX blog. There was one entry by a man, and I really did lose my shit.
Not that it will change their precious fee fees, but someone needs to drill to these guys that a population majority is not the same as a social majority.
Men (some men, #notallmen, blahblahblah, *fartnoise*) will not stop until there isn’t a single space, place, event, etc. where women think they can be free of the gaze or judgement. Yet god forbid you ever criticize a good ol’ boys’ club because then you’re destroying the fabric of society.
The two white dudes who essentially abandoned two women in a van to drown? Basically just got fired. Tell me again that this isn’t about skin color.
“It’s too girly” = “ONLY MEN SHOULD RESPOND TO THE TV SHOWS. WE SHOULD EXPERIENCE NO EMOTIONS OTHER THAN LAUGHTER AND HATE. IF WE LAUGH AT SOMETHING WE HATE, EVEN BETTER.”
Larson took some of the plot from Schulman, and spoiler alert, also “plagiarized” Puccini, I guess, because some of the show is based on La Boheme. Schulman didn’t (and couldn’t) take legal action because Larson didn’t use any of her material word-for-word. He incorporated some general plot points, and general plot…
I thought Rent was based on La Boheme.
If they can’t air the show after tragic acts of gun violence, when is there going to be a time when they can air it? Like, when is there a time when there has been no recent gun violence?
“It was a joke for (my husband).”
If a doctor doesn’t lose their medical license for this then what exactly does it take?
I don’t think Hazel watched more than a couple of episodes. The show definitely isn’t targeted at children (while Sabrina remains a virgin through the entire season, there are several racy scenes, including a pansexual witch orgy) scattered across the series. Also, while the show does say that Satan demands that his…
“Sabrina seems built for a much younger audience—maybe even children.”
And every time I hear “But there are moderate Republicans!” I get more and more pissed off. If they’re going to hang around and make nice with Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists, they aren’t moderate.
Yup. She’s just not daytime TV material. She’s a coldhearted bitch and can’t do fluffy, feel-good morning TV nonsense the was Kelly Ripa, Seacrest, Hoda et al. can. She belongs on right wing cable TV - i.e. Fox News - arguing with people Santa’s skin colour, blackface and PC culture ruining the world. I have no doubt…
This show is explicitly about Sabrina rejecting the patriarchal system of hell. Are you saying patriarchy shouldn’t be depicted in the media?
By my math, an initial 1k, plus 2k per year for 18 years, you’d need about 3.3% interest to hit 50k. Not too unreasonable.
Was the weird dud’s name “Brett” by any chance?