areyouserious2-4
areyouserious2-4
areyouserious2-4

Yeah but THIS site and its posters jumped ALL over that shite.

Entourage took $17 million over weekend, missing it’s projections by $3 million. Was a cheap movie which will be in black by Wednesday. Frankly the comparisons between the two movie’s is odd.

If Tampa wins, they'll have the same amount as Chicago within the last 50 years so this really makes no sense. You can just say you don't like the Blackhawks, it's ok.

Seems like an apples to oranges comparison. Spy cost $70 million to make, Entourage $27 million. Would have been shocking Entourage had beaten it. Also Spy looks funny and Entourage is boring.

So if you aren’t doing any of them I don’t get the issue ?

I think the dadbod is running out of steam...at least I really hope so.

It was an article where a woman said she found it attractive, so now lot’s of feminists have been finding creative ways to talk about how much they find it disgusting for *reasons*. I’ve seen people here complain that they are forced by some Hollywood conspiracy to find fat dudes attractive. Idk.

Holy Christ, this isn't female Viagra. It doesn't provide mechanical benefit and Viagra doesn't provide libido. Yall really need a science writer.

Yeah I thought the beauty in art was always about how the same piece can be interpreted so differently depending on the viewer.

Is it ok to be against rape but still think this sucks

Fair point, however no one likes a one-upper. Which is what this comment smacked of to me

That’s great, but off-topic. We’re talking about WWII

I remember studying Russian in the Soviet Union in the late 1980s- the glaring lack of old men was stunning. There were plenty of old women, who swept streets, sold the ubiquitous tickets needed for museum entry, told complete strangers to wipe their feet before entering, to stay off the grass, to button up a coat

So they were satisfied with their pay until they learned that other actors were also making that satisfactory amount? So do they want more money now or just for other people to make less money?

Umm... I think Martin Sheen is *currently* a bigger star than Jane Fonda. If you look at her filmography, she took a fifteen year break in 1990, and really only started making watchable stuff in 2012:

I’m trying to understand why basically the same story had to run twice about a guy who’s career ended a while ago. I get a book was released, but really? Or was it just another excuse to run the “practice” rant again?

Not really. He’s very chill but also kind of... emotionally immature? He’s douchey in the sense that he gets all up on his high horse about having “artistic integrity” and whines for E and Ari to go find him projects. I dunno, his character isn’t very deep. He exists as an excuse for the rest of the cast to entertain

Grenier isn’t bad in it but sorely lacks the kind of charisma that his character should have displayed. Without the “entourage” and Ari (Piven) rounding out the cast, it would have been a total snoozefest.

I really hate it when self righteous internet warriors start abuse campaigns against the parents of dead children. When you’ve lost a child, you can talk. Otherwise, “there but for the grace of god...” and STFU.