to prove that the child was born alive and thus within medical rescue, the prosecutors used an arcane, discredited 17th-century test in which the fetus's lungs are removed and put in liquid to see if they can float, and they floated.

C'mon, man. Like any of us don't follow UW-Platteville.

You're one of the stupidest fucking people I have ever seen post on Deadspin. Kids aren't entitled to dunks. It wasn't a questionable technical and it was not inconsequential. Look at the chin-up and the swinging of the legs. Refs aren't taught to bite the whistle in consideration of the score and/or time left.

If you want to make the slippery slope argument, you have to show be able to show that this forced sterilization will actually lead to state-sponsored genocide. If you can't do that, you're committing the slippery slope fallacy.

Forced sterilization is wrong. Sterilization as a choice to avoid jail time is fine.

Pshh Nick Saban giving a young African American male a second chance, what an asshole. You're right Rohan, he shouldn't have had that chance, he should have been abandoned from the get go by major colleges, and foregone his athletic future.

i have no love for the dead, but they're probably the highest grossing band of all time in concert revenue. you're being foolish.

After an amazing basketball game this is what you bitch about? There was a last second shot. And Notre Dame missed it.

I watched the entire game. Either Notre Dame could also beat an NBA team or, in reality, anyone that says Kentucky could beat an NBA team is a fucking moron.

what the fuck kid of headline/article is this? That game was awesome. I can't tell whether this is just bullshit complaining or just awful trolling/sarcasm.

Ugh, I really really want these guys to lose. I'm tired of everyone hoping for the perfect season, perfect is boring. Give me the underdog 10 times out of 10.

It was an obvious foul though. You have to call it when it's that blatant.

Why is it ok when the anti-gun people do it, though? Neither app is ok. It's not ok to target people who own guns by putting their names and addresses on the web. And it's not ok to target people who are anti-gun. I know the app targeting gun owners has some sort of subjective "believe" they are unsafe criteria,…

Not to change the topic, but this is EXACTLY why I feel "analytics" are overrated. Before I get jumped, I'm not saying they're useless. I'm not saying they're meaningless. There's obviously a distinct purpose for them.

The second app you describe, Gun Geo Marker, is not a reasonable endeavour. It sounds fucking crazy. And crazy begets crazy. It is not a good idea to mark out someone's name and address, no matter what there stance is on gun right or any other issue.

Amazing to think that soccer players actually can stay on their feet after contact when they really want to.

You seem to be missing the distinction between on obligation for reciprocity, which would be coercive, and the principle that it is selfish to only take and one should, in pinciple, be willing to give as well.

OK, and vaginas of the world, no one owes you free dinners, free entertainment like movies and trips, valentines day extravaganzas, and so on, no matter how swell you think you are. Quit being so selfish.

Smart girl. It's like they say on the "streets": Snitches get non-superficial flesh wounds that will not heal with simple bandaging, but almost always require the use of medical sutures to ensure loss of blood is kept to a minimum and reduce the risk of infection. Don't tattle y'all!

The conversation continues, though, and it gets more damning from there: