You are a dink if you think they had no input on the plot and major casting. Any investors in a movie or any business where they plunked down millions WILL have investor meetings with the creators and can pull funding. For instance, doubt you’ll have any real lesbian relationships or abortions in a Koch funded movie.

As the writer on Slate wrote: I’m not really surprised.

I hope people know that to foster means to keep the pet for a short time until someone else adopts - not that she has 400 cats. 400 in her lifetime. I mean over 10 years if you fostered 2 cats for a month, then ...lemme see, 2 x 12, x 10...240 cats. Damn, that’s a lot of cats. Even if she has done it for more than 10…

This is how Trump spite voters got created. Just enjoying the fight, and measuring things on how much people object and hoping for “shakeup.” Seat of privilege it is.

Nope.

But seriously, I guess women’s rights and LGBT rights don’t matter to you. They are just okay to stomp on. They aren’t real people.

Calling women who are in tech as biologically not the norm is hate.

Any religion that says that a woman’s head is immodest and not proper to fully show in public, while a man’s head: totally okay as created is not feminist. Full stop.

A woman arguing for a Muslim-ruled state is kind of like a self-hating Jew. Because just look at Muslim-ruled states on how they treat women. And as I said before, if you think you must show devotion by covering your head, while not demanding your husbands and sons do so as well, you have a view of the world where…

Actually to wear a symbol that your head is not okay just as it is created to your god is not a feminist idea.

As a feminist, I believe that my head was created equal to a man and that any higher power would not require a woman to cover her head, particularly when said deity thinks that an uncovered male head is just fine, created just fine as it is, and shows proper faith and deference uncovered everyday in public.

Damore’s memo read:

it is hateful to define a whole class of people who are in the woman package as less than in their thinking, their ambition, and don’t forget, the whole screed is about arguing that there is no discrimination - just that the womenz aren’t as good at tech — as a class of people.

Yeah, he did site that people in the woman package just are this way: they aren’t ambitious, they cannot be as good at tech, because they are good at “feelings and people,” and also - not as good in the scientific thinking if you are in the woman package - biologically.

Nope. She is pro-Trump. She was one of those pro-Bernie people that voted Trump. And stumped for Trump. And tweeted for Trump. This is not satire.

The person you need to talk to is not “don’tcallmeshirley” to see how people handle it - who sez it’s all piss and giggles for her being taken care of by a “certified adult.”

You admitted you were a “kid” and your husband was a “certified adult” when you married.

From her response, she said she was a “kid” and he was a “certified adult” when she made the decision to marry him and enter wonderland. No problems since she has been in her twenties and now early thirties where as a child she has been taken care of by a “certified adult.”By definition, a “kid” never thought about…

There isn’t another side to hate.