Good. Go convince them. In order to convince them you have to let them speak.

Good. Go convince them. In order to convince them you have to let them speak.

I totally agree. Go convince them.

I totally agree. Go convince them.

No, these pharmacists are, in their eyes, making it about the thing in the woman that they see as a living person.

I have no idea if they are interested in having a conversation or not, but I would urge them to do it as I'm urging everyone here.

Depends if you think the fetus is a person with rights. If you do (I don't) then what they are doing is protecting the right to life of a human. Go argue that with them. But in order for you to argue it with them you have to let them say it.

You know as well as I do they consider the fetus within the woman a human being, so why are you pretending that they don't think what they are doing is perfectly fair... They see themselves as preventing a great injustice. So does the soldier, so does the person who refuses to discriminate.

Following orders is a pretty essential part of any soldiers job. If he was ordered to torture and didn't you'd still think he was virtuous.

As I said in my original post, if you want to argue about the way religion has been incorporated into law go right ahead.

You know, right, that the pharmacist thinks the fetus is a human being and that Plan B will kill it?

When the soldier refuses to torture and the white person refuses to discriminate they are making choices to save other people from something they see as unjust. Same for the pharmacist. The pharmacist sees what you are doing and thinks it is a unjust thing to do to the human living inside of you.

If the guy being torured is a (suspected) terrorist then the soldier should really just shut up and do his job.

Do you imagine they don't see themselves as saving lives? They do. Again, feel free to have the moral argument, have it on metaphysical grounds of the status of a fetus. Just don't tell them to shut up and do their jobs.

I'd just like to put this out there so we don't toss out the baby with the bathwater (most apt use of that simile ever)

I'm no Daily Show writer, although I'd like to be, but I imagine someone there is, right now, going through and finding the tape that surely exists of Elisabeth Hasselbeck criticizing the media for their GOTCHA! journalsim.... when it happened to Sarah Palin.

There is no sense of "logical" in which what you've described is more logical.

Google already has a "Keep my opt outs" extension, which says: Permanently opts your browser out of online ad personalization via cookies.

So to recap: According to Gawker, Reddit is a cesspool of pornography stolen from young women who are helpless victims of a misogynistic mob. Whereas here at Gawker we only post the classiest photos of women who clearly had no desire to be photographed naked let alone have the image plastered all over the internet.…

I couldn't agree more.