Possible alternate headline: “Possible First Woman President Promises Equality in Cabinet, Internet Goes Apeshit About ‘Qualifications’”

Unless his thesis is on, like, the cultural and socioeconomic implications of Teresa calling Danielle a Prostitution Whore on the RHoNJ.

I’ll give you three.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83. Anthony Kennedy is 79. Antonin Scalia is dead.

If you don’t vote for Hillary Clinton if she’s the nominee, even that means you stay home, you are also voting for the end of Roe v. Wade, national right to work laws, and looser gun laws.

And that’s just the Supreme Court.…

That Crime Bill that Bernie voted for?

When Hillary criticized his referring to Trump’s remarks on punishing women for abortion as a “distraction,” he hyped that up to her saying he’s antichoice. Entirely.

If Bernie calling Hillary “unqualified” isn’t a blatant case of pot > kettle > black, I don’t know what is.

I do love a millennial who thinks 40 years olds are so old we don’t know what the internet is or how to use it. (do they not teach the history of the technology in school?)

Bernie Cons:

If you can read the entirety of the Daily News Editorial article, where he’s going on about not knowing the specifics of his one fleshed out policy idea, or the legal implications of breaking up banks, or saying he’s going to renegotiate ALL of our trade deals like that’s nothing, or his fundamental misunderstanding…

Jesus Christ. You fucking people who always say “I’d vote for Elizabeth Warren,” as though she is some sort of magical unicorn substitute vagina person who would be SO PERFECT “not like that hideous criminal Hillary Clinton who is SO HORRIBLE and I’m not SEXIST because I would vote for the one woman Senator I can name”

The highlighted sections were pretty curated, there. Here’s a different excerpt:

This article isn’t critical of Sanders, is the point. He admitted in the interview that he doesn’t know if what he’s proposing is legal, he said he’d use Executive fiat to break up the banks (and then almost immediately contradicted himself), he has to admit that he has no idea how he’d carry out one of the central…

They are excoriating him for it because he demonstrated that he lacked basic knowledge on a topic he talks about constantly. He isn’t wrong about how the system is fucked, but it is a problem that he has zero interest in figuring out how to fix it beyond giving speeches. I like the guy, but this is a serious flaw of…

I’m starting to think that Elizabeth Warren is the go-to hypothetical for people who want to defend against sexism in this election. Everyone says they would vote for her! She isn’t running, so it’s very easy to say that.

I have to object, here. The Slot and Jezebel are ever being accused of holding a bias towards Sanders. But when an article that is critical of Sanders appears, the same criticism is thrown.

So this is what it looks like when journalists finally start vetting Sanders, huh?

I’d rather have Sam Bee doing the amazing work she does once a week than a watered-down version every night. Her show is fucking INSANE. It’s consistently better than peak TDS, which is saying something.

Okay. This is the moment where I’ve made the full transition from “I have high hopes for Trevor Noah on the Daily Show!” to “okay, this election is getting crazy, and Noah isn’t delivering anything but easy, superficial jokes, and I really miss Jon Stewart” to full-on “fuck Trevor Noah, the Daily Show rightfully…

Then have fun with another generation of a conservative SCOTUS.

How about we stop zoo’s too? Unless they are sanctuaries, why must we hold animals captive for our own entertainment.