archdukechocula--disqus
Archdukechocula
archdukechocula--disqus

I made the connection when I played it the first time. I spent 30 minutes diligently trying to catch the fast fish. I did not save Cid. I assumed that I couldn't after about the 20th fish. I gave up. Years later I read that you could save him and I got pissed.

>First, I don't think that's a "very big problem". In conspiracies there's always a risk that someone will talk. However, you're missing something big in your very big problem. Do you think the world is going to view these bandits as credible witnesses?

There is one very big problem with this theory. Once the bandits are part of her army, they will talk. Their story about what happened and why would inevitably leak. Temporarily silencing this woman would hardly be a permanent solution to that problem. It makes no sense to silence her in this context only to release

I think you are confused about what I am laughing at. It's absolutely funny when a show portrays real psychological issues in such a hackneyed, campy way because they think it is both a writing shortcut and a way to appeal to a certain demographic.

I laughed when it was revealed Bruce was a cutter. That's just… wow.

I think Colin Farrell did well in his role, though I certainly agree that the other actors like Ralph Fiennes and Brendan Gleeson were great. I suppose you could accuse Farrell of overacting, but given the magnitude of his crime his character had committed, I didn't really feel that way. It is worth noting that he

As a guy that went to law school, I'll take that as a compliment.

It was contrasting various versions of judgment (particularly Catholic views on judgment) namely guilt (Ray's view), retribution (Ken's view) and redemption (Harry's view). That's why it takes place in a medieval city. That's why the city is Bruges, a word derived from bridge, representing a moral crossing. That's why

In Bruges isn't a crime movie, it's a philosophy film.

>Needless to say, I felt my decision to kill indiscriminately had been justified

Yeah, although I think by the end of season 3, it was becoming apparent that this was the direction it was headed in. That's why I stopped watching personally. I was pretty much positive that the only coherent explanation for what was going on was going to be some sort of religious angle. There was just way too much

Lord of the Danse Macabre.

What part of the game are you on?

Surely you had a house-rule to re-roll as ground dice. I thought that was near universal.

Get a signal repeater. They're only like $20-$30. Either that or run some ethernet through the floor.

A cup of coffee woefully underpopulated by bees? My briefcase full of bees ought to fix that!

If you aren't confused, befuddled and revolted while watching Eraserhead you simply aren't paying attention.

The Billiard Room did it.

Which they probably will unfortunately. The common law of torts and property is pretty clear on this. Unless the animal couldn't be legally owned in the first place based on Indian statutes, these guys won't have much of a legal defense to their theft of the animal. This is basic conversion. They might be able to

But what if it isn't a gimmick at all, but a genuine commenter whose parents named him Barry Literal? You ever think of that? Huh? Did ya?