arandomguy1
ARandomGuy1
arandomguy1

Yes. Because throwing loads and loads of cash at a single Wide Receiver is a fantastic investment. Lest we forget how his spectacular playoff performances have warranted them wanting to keep him around. Oh wait... Well at least his performance in the regular season has been giving them the 1st round byes... oh wait.

This video would give Cher an outright heart attack

This sounds like a burger meant to be cooked to Medium Rare, and then thrown in the microwave for 5 minutes.

Take it from some of the comments here, you need to read many many more. Crichton is a treasure. I always recommend starting with Jurassic Park and then the Lost World. If one could believe it, I actually think the book The Lost World is better than Jurassic Park (at least I think the case can be made). After that, if

I actually think they did, it’s in the scene where Mr. Masrani is yelling at Dr. Wu for manufacturing the Indominus Rex. From Quora:

Agreed there.

I see you have Jurassic Park in your image. That book is a surefire way to trick anybody into reading because it the most goddamn amazing book ever written. Literally pure fun and excitement the whole way through.

Additional fun fact that continually cracks me up working in a Finance office:

Depends how drunk I am.

I wish someone would take a sample size of games, break down the length of them, and quantify which parts of the game time was spent on (Warming Up, Between Innings, Pitcher deciding on a Pitch), etc etc, and see what the largest chunks of time spent are on. Evaluate whether too much of a game is spent on one

Philosophical thought:

I would put a fair amount of emphasis on how Charismatic you are as a person anyways. Not that subject matter doesn’t matter, but as a story teller I’d think a big portion of you audience’s attention span is how much they want to hear from you.

Why does this man continue to find work?

This kind of sounds like a parental problem 101. Taking how stimuli in the world is shown to your child, and how to contextualize it for them in a way that fits your parental style or view of the world.

I’m not usually one for trying to appropriate roles of color just for the sake of “look how progressive we are!” I try to always view it in the eye of true population demographics. As much as we like to see diversity, the fact of the matter is that (per U.S. census data) as this might come as a shock, the reason

Ahh awesome fourth idea the article totally whiffed on! Break up for a week! Problem solved!

Unpopular opinion: It’s okay to be morally against an organization that involves something you disagree with fundamentally. If someone wants to commit suicide we have laws that prohibit both for you to do it to yourself or for someone to administer it for you. It’s not our body, it’s yours, yet we still can control it

Question to the liberal community:

What is the argument for pro-illegal immigration? Is it the moral obligation that’s pointing higher than the legal obligation?
I often get mixed with the group of “racist and xenophobic” community for asking this, but I have absolutely nothing against legal immigration, and in fact,

Holy fucking shit I love Obama, voted him twice, and agree he did great things for the economy, but speweing the metrics from 2009 til present is vastly over-attributing the economic success directly to him and falling into the statistical fallacy of Selection Bias. Naturally, you pick the lowest starting point and

A show that makes you think practically and intellectually? Definitely not a fit for 2017, you’re right.