apullin
apullin
apullin

Doubt == invention.

Many phones support 2.1A and even 2.5A charging rates now.

I have a 91. My elderly neighbor across the street backed into the front fender of it, crushing it in. he said he would pay for the repair.

Toyota should just remake the Previa, but with a Prius drivetrain installed. Not even update the body styling.

No Cizeta V16T?

Eh, I get what you're saying. I converted most of my liquid assets, and now I keep ~$750K in gold in a safe deposit box in a bank, but my on-paper reported taxable income in very low. So now I benefit from subsidized housing, food stamps, and all sorts of other benefit programs, much like the woman in the article.

They used to cut off people's hands if they didn't collect enough rubber in one day. Even if they were 5 year olds kids, they'd have their hands cut off for not meeting quotas.

$170m sounds insanely cheap. As in, 100x too cheap.

There is talk of making a robot from all edible materials ...

Better solution is fully robotic cockroaches. See Biomimetic Millisystems Lab / Fearing / Berkeley.

Selective consideration is the most powerful argumentative, analytic, or rhetorical tool, other than outright invention.

No one has said the YF-23? It just looks so odd, like it shouldn't be flying:

Now playing

People should take the time to watch this:

RDRAM.

I don't see why the automakers can't make a serial hybrid with a tiny 25HP engine. Just a little 400cc boxer, or something, that could mount way in the rear, and be dead easy to drop out and service. Then, over time, transition it to a fully electric design by growing the battery pack at a market-salable rate.

> Drones can/could be used for creepy purposes, therefore all usages of drones are creepy.

Sex simulation.

Doubtful that he'd reach 800mph. That would be supersonic. Maybe briefly at high altitudes, but anything below 100Kft, he's be decelerating significantly to terminal velocity.

A *class*? Hrm. Weird. I learned both of those things from real life experience.

ahaha, Gawker Media isn't allowed to show any pictures of civilians with firearms or firearm accessories in a positive or neutral light.