So now Harely riders are literally going to have to do this:
So now Harely riders are literally going to have to do this:
I remember when that prototype was first shown. There was some *serious* Gawker payola going on there. Every single gawker sub-site had 3x stories a day on it for a solid week. Shit, I think there were even stories on Jezebel about it.
Panicking on a bicycle causes weird stuff to happen, due to body weight shifting and camber thrust steering. And at low speeds, you don't have angular momentum helping you out, either.
The state is in the wrong 2x here. First, the entirety of the restoration work, including all labor hours put into it, can be treated as damages caused by the state to Caperon. Second, unless they can establish mens rea for the ownership of the car on the part of Caperon, there's no basis for the transfer of property…
The can on the back is probably just an expansion chamber, that would allow the sound pressure level of the exhaust to be measured in a closed-environment sort of way.
normal != average
normal !eqiv average
No person has ever been killed with intent with an object other than a gun. I defy anyone to provide even a single counter example.
Yes. It's been coming for so so long.
If it was all boys winning, Jezebel would be writing about a gender gap. If it was all whites, Jezebel would be the ones complaining about a minorities gap.
Usually, these things have nothing to do with the actual bits of morality they are sold under, and there's some underlying cause. Like the teacher being a union rep, or something.
> passive aggressively implying they suck at driving.
Entirely disproven here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrInActi…
Bravo Jezebel. This is another of your jems that belongs in a museum.
Why aren't semi trucks all serial hybrid electric drive? Seriously. There is that DOE program that is showing 12 mpg trucks. The amount of fuel that could be saved by doing a cash-for-clunkers on rigs like that would be significant on a national scale.
Some people believe in a right to privacy. This whole affair is quite a maelstrom (or femaelstrom, hahah) of crossing of private/public boundaries, and of impropriety and morality.
Why doesn't someone just design a car that is specifically meant to be easy to work on, super cheap to maintain? Then sell it based on that point, on overall cost of ownership?
Gravity, for example, would not pass the test.
One group of mostly one gender shows animosity towards a group that is mostly of another gender.
Yeah, this is tragic.
Whoa whoa, isn't this implicitly promoting rape?
Well, to be fair, none of the incidents indicate that they were *serial* rapists. I wonder if a name would have to be listed multiple times for that to be the case?