No, ageism is exactly what you are doing - dismissing candidates out of hand because you consider them too old despite not having any information on their health. Biden shouldn’t be president because he’d be a bad president not because he’s old. Unless you are saying that we can’t trust a democratic president to be…

Wouldn’t that make for some excellent television?

Hell yeah

“In 2016, hundreds of thousands of Bernie people failed to show up to vote for Hillary. They didn’t vote at all, but if they had voted for Hillary she would be president.”

It makes no sense to vote for a worse candidate just because they are younger. I almost understand the people who think Bernie and Biden are too old but saying that Warren is too old to be president is blatantly ageist and wrong. My first choice is Sanders but Warren would make a fine president, the rest are either…

If only so he calls Joe Biden a murderer to his face it would be worth it. 

As Ive said before, the rule should be that if you’re polling below Mike Gravel you are automatically out. 

We literally live in the worst episode of “Veep”

These kind of plans - like the ACA - are based around reducing the amount of people actually using health insurance. Its not an unintended consequence its part of the plan. 

I honestly have no idea what your argument is at this point. You’re all over the place. Take a moment to focus yourself and come back to me. 

That is a very problematic attitude. Its literally the reason people give to excuse things like warrantless wire tapping “If youre not guilty of anything, what do you have to hide?” In my opinion Trump is hiding his long, long history of shady financial crimes and actual wealth.

They are though. Archery is fun and there is no purpose to it other than to stick a pointy arrow into something. 

Obstruction sure, I 100% agree that the president is guilty of obstruction of justice and violating the emoluments clause. To me, this is enough to impeach him, we don’t need Russian red herrings and conspiracy theories.  

Because it was the only specific thing you referenced, lol!And were wrong about, btw. 

Lol, what a standard you’ve set for yourself there. A mountain of evidence yet literally no one is in jail for russian interference. 

Because your argument is largely vague and circumstantial. What happened, who did it?What is “the thing”?I’ve addressed your rich person point.

Calm down, nephew. The person I replied to said "rich people...in jail" from your own list the only person that is in jail is manafort. Don't be so defensive and at least try to form a cohesive argument.

We know something happened, we dont know what and we don’t know it’s extent.

But we’re not, we are currently in a bad Tom Clancy novel instead where everyone online you don’t like is a Russian Dev/GRU operative. It's not irrelevant for this kind of situation to sour a little introspection about how the game is played and what is our own role. Did we ask for this by fucking around in other…

Youre right dude you've found me out I'm a KGB sleeper agent shit my covers blown fuck