Normalcy is not an effective way to determine the effectiveness or merit of something. What a waste of server space. Morons.

*deep breath*

Considering her daddy was a “higher up” in Al Queda and she was living with terrorists...no.

Oooooh okay. Now I understand. I just needed more “fucks” in your response. Lol

Cyclists will actually be a SMALL problem for autonomous cars. The autonomous cars will be a BIG problem for the cyclists, however...

What is simply not true?

Horse injections, huh...who knew...wait...*scrolling up to view author*...TORCHINSKYYYYYY

Or the Saudi government actually has sufficient resources to properly vet refugees...

This is a ban on refugees entering the U.S. from nations that don’t have sufficient ways to look into the background of the refugees. There is an exception for those of minority religions because they are more likely to be persecuted for religious reasons, and Saudi Arabia is not included because they DO have…

I don’t think that’s a fair assessment. Snowmobiles sales have been flat at best (https://www.statista.com/statistics/369002/snowmobile-sales-in-the-united-states/), but they’re still selling sleds because there’s sufficient volume and profit margin. ATV sales are flat (https://www.statista.com/statistics/326013/us-a…

You try this bullisht with some women (my wife) and you’re liable to get yourself shot...

Okay, you go ahead and convince the rest of America to buy plug-in hybrids. The question was “how does higher efficiency requirements hurt the consumer” and the answer is “it makes cars more expensive.” Your plug in hybrid is a great example of that.

You act like the auto makers can just wave their magic wand and make the gas consumption lower. You have to sacrifice something for that. Less power for smaller engines, fewer features for less weight, or higher cost for more technologically advanced engines and other systems. We have a good balance right now. …

Unless you have the lowest tax rate....then there won’t be. I double checked my math on that.

If you decide to work for a company that doesn’t pay you a livable wage, you’re an idiot. Make good life choices. It’s really not that hard.

Lawmakers seem to think that they can endlessly pass higher and higher standards and that the companies will endlessly be able to meet them. All I’m saying is this: just because you make a standard doesn’t mean everyone (or anyone) will be capable of meeting it. Someday we’ll hit a point where it’s as good as it’s…

I’m not assuming, I’m in the industry and know the numbers. These companies sell certain products that, in a bad year, are actually not profitable. Saying “just adapt to the changing environment. Be more flexible,” isn’t always feasible. At some point it becomes unreasonable to have a fleet fuel economy of 100 mpg…

Preeetty sure I would have stuffed it into the ditch.

The problem with this prohibition is that many places (like Minnesota) have left exits. In these places we have three options:
1. Don’t have a “keep right” law
2. Don’t enforce the “keep right” law
3. People keep right until the last minute, crossing multiple lanes to try to make their left exit

*Donald Trump has a big, normal-sized celebration* “OMG Donald Trump is spending all of this taxpayer money on himself doesn’t he already have enough money OMGGGGG”