@SkipErnst: When I first saw it, I thought it was a burnt-out bulb.

@silverserver: haha! That's what I saw on first glance.

@sylar1: How so? If you're going to criticize an idea like that, you'll have to be a little more specific.

@Fossa: The guy on the top-right has a rope; it's just not very visible in that shot.

I thought he could use his witchcraft to fly...?

@j814jwong1: BP is already paying massive amounts of money to clean up the spill.

@BearsBeetsBattlestarGalactica: The dispersants weren't used to make the oil magically disappear; they were used to, as you said, "disperse" the oil throughout the gulf so that petroleum-consuming bacteria would be able to quickly take care of most of the oil.

@pseudocubes: It's all good! :)

This alarm clock is 10 times louder, at 140 decibels. If this

@ThePr1nce: There's no need for douche-calling. Besides, I'm a

@Kat Hannaford: I think there was an issue for a small group of people, but it's since cleared up.

That's a fantastic idea. I might actually consider buying one. I'll probably modify it to accept larger candles, though.

@golferal: Does your opinion of how attractive a woman is have anything to do with the article? That's not what these comments are here for.

@golferal: People have been banned before for commenting on the attractiveness (or lack thereof) of women mentioned in articles.

@golferal: You're a star. Why would you promote a comment like that?

Here's what the letter says to me:

@3qɹ: Giz rarely acknowledges their tipsters. That, and it was posted in #whitenoise a day earlier.

@techngro: There's no need for namecalling. Just because some issues aren't important to you doesn't mean that they shouldn't be important issues to others.

@SGTalon: Just so you know, it's better to email Gizmodo than it is to post tips like this:

@El Guano: My comment was more for the commenters saying that they got a profit out of this.