Claim: “The number of downright abusive and deplorable men in the film and TV industry is staggering.”

You literally just make shit up. Your pathetic. You probably drool on yourself and ask it’s raining. You don’t know anything about anything but somehow have a superiority complex.

I’m not totally sure I understand that ‘Gay’ test rubric of “live extravagantly for no explained reason”. We still don’t know how the Little Lebowski made his money.

No. I suppose you’re about to counter my “anecdotes aren’t numbers” stance with... more anecdotes?

The Soda/Pop thing eats at me. I’m a northwesterner. I grew up saying “pop” and I also know other people (stupidly) said soda. After 6 years in NYC, I say Soda, and I can’t stop - even though I’ve moved back to the west coast. I want to say Pop... but it sounds so... casual. informal. unspecific.

It looks like he printed the e-mail to himself and then scanned it back as an image.

>On one hand we’re talking about mostly wealthy, powerful white men getting away with deplorable behavior as a matter of course.

Fair enough, there is no critic with more to say than Cash Dollars

What did you search for? I think the “Hollywood” thing might be too tough - what constitutes as “in hollywood”? There’s probably no correct answer. We’ll probably never really know.

I dunno i feel like anecdotes are not the appropriate response to “what are the actual numbers?”

The underground artists are always better than the mainstream stars.

I was not listening to much new music when this hit. I finally listened.

>The number of downright abusive and deplorable men in the film and TV industry is staggering.

and the united states developed a nuclear bomb and then dropped it on non-combatants. We’re all* still passport holders.

You’re supposed to see three women with beautiful skin. Who use dove products.

some dude from my high school: “Pussy don’t have a face”

according to the article, the ad goes black->white->latina?

But the alternative explanation is way crazier: “We intended to make and publicize a racist ad” - I’m really inclined to believe the problem is myopia rather than consciously attempting to introduce a racist ad.

That main image looks pretty egregious, but assuming it’s a mistake, it’s understandable: If everyone in the room knows the “story”, they lose the ability to recognize the unintentional story that others will see. That Tariq Nasheed tweet is, IMO wrong: If they knew what they were doing, why would they do it? Does he…

Normally I’m pretty chill about the responsibilities of bystanders - by and large, ALL OF US opt to do nothing whenever possible. But this seems a little egregious - Dude physically drags a girl against her will into a bathroom and everyone kinda minds their business? Seems over the line.