The epithet “tree-hugger” has suddenly taken on fetishistic new importance

I agree. Time to pull up roots and branch off.

I’m stumped. That sap sounds like dead wood. Leaf him and make sure he’s cut out of your life. You’ve already run rings around him.

To be fair to Ukraine they are currently engaged in a bloody civil war and threat of Russian invasion.

I distinctly remember when I listened to it that they outed him, and then went so far as to speculate that what he was doing with the S&M stuff was because he was an unfulfilled gay man and then sought ought a former lover and interviewed him. When they began speculating that John was not in his right mind because of…

You should’ve seen the tacky af blinds I put on my glass door so I could pump milk.  I know the design-minded building manager loved that shit.

What’s weird to me is that they never seem to be at the right place on the desk. I’m either hitting my knees or it provides no real cover. Usually both.

I worked at a place that was supposedly a progressive, left-leaning non-profit, and we designed & built a new building while I was there. It was all open concept with glass walls everywhere because “transparency” I guess. The main staircase was also glass until one of the employees piped up and said “SKIRTS, YOU…

Huh. The fact that my office door is completely glass and I have a table rather than a desk with what I’m told is called a “modesty panel” to prevent upskirt views suddenly makes a whole lot more sense.

seriously... one of the major themes from the show is that John B. felt he didn’t have any family that cared about his welfare, just the potential of the gold he’d hid.

Who wants to bet it’s those cousins from Florida who weren’t portrayed in the greatest light? They came across in the podcast as making a cash-grab anyways.

I’m not the law-adjacent person you’re looking for, but I do have a journalism degree. Further, just as a normal person, I’d like to point out that journalists aren’t entitled to write about anyone they want. They either need 1. a written release (or verbal in the case of states that are okay with that) or 2. need to…

They didn’t get a written release? I would have thought with all the recorded conversations they would have something, right?

I wasn’t sure if he was scared shitless or if he had Parkinson’s disease.

Facebook is, for all intents and purposes, complicit. Zuckerberg took a meeting with Ted Cruz and some other “conservatives” who were whining and moaning about Facebook being “biased against conservatives”. I practically have an allergy to all that incredible projection and myopia, at the same time I just want to…

I have a new article about Jungian psychology and whiteness – written by a white man, even – that I’m handing out copies to of any wypipo who’ll even think about reading it. Their projecting is a HUUUUUUUUUGE source of the problem. This incredibly hypocritical white dude numbskull – also, gay Republican, really???…

I stopped using that when we had definitive proof of their political white biased hate mongering russian bot accepting bullshit.

This is typical of Facebook. They’ll leave all kinds of hateful, false shit up by white supremacists then take down a post that talks about white supremacy by a Black person. It’s par for the course for Fuckbook.

Why did Facebook take her post down? Because she used his full name?

According to police (take this with a grain of salt)