Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    ankuramin--disqus
    AKA
    ankuramin--disqus

    I've been watching Supernatural since it started and it just entered S11 so a pretty long time.

    A bit surprising on Lincoln as he hasn't even tried to do anything other than TWD since he got the role. No other film or TV credits since 2010 which is kind of amazing.

    Based on this article, Gilliam barely liking Ant-Man is a win.

    I remember seeing the script for this on the Blacklist a while ago and it sounded terrible, why a lot of people wanted it made I'll never understand.

    Rupert Grint was in a movie called Thunderpants where he played the best friend to a kid whose superpower was farting. Not joking…he actually farts his way into space to save astronauts in the film's climax.

    If he was going to get permanently cast anywhere, Legends of Tomorrow was probably the best bet.

    We can agree to disagree I guess. I thought the show did a great job in making the viewer understand Rye's motivations in the brief time he had in the first episode and Peggy / Ed's situation was very similar to Nygaard's in that they committed a crime in haste and are trying to cover it up. I also seem to remember

    I've felt like S1 has had the exact same pace as S1 personally. I don't remember any S1 episodes that ever focused solely on one particular character.

    I can only hope for a hilarious follow-up story of LAPD and NYPD members caught sneaking around to watch Hateful Eight when it comes out.

    They can do whatever they want if the movies are good IMO.

    You know…why does TTD and Hardwick have insider information on what is coming up anyways? Isn't the talk show supposed to be appealing because it discusses episodes from the same viewpoint as a fan who just saw the episode?

    There are no comic spoilers in your post…

    On the actual episode review, me and a few posters came up with a few ways the survivors could be herding off zombies based on earlier seasons:

    I don't see it as a problem so much as a necessity for show writers / producers to evolve. Cliffhangers really are a lazy form of writing IMO as they usually are not meaningful in the long-term story and are just a device used to keep people tuning in.

    Especially considering they showed on the show that works when Glenn and Tara used riot gear to escape the prison.

    There are a lot of hints he isn't dead and I agree it is annoying that they didn't just make it clear one way or the other. Cliffhangers on a show like this, where set leaks are normal and there is a talk show afterwards to discuss, are just stupid.

    I've often wondered why the gang has never covered themselves in rotting blood and guts since S1. Are they so disgusted by the gore / smell that they would rather risk death?

    Jesus shows up and rescues him?

    I get Forte is the main character so we know him to be harmless but Phil 2.0 wasn't exactly unwarranted in seeing him as a threat last season. He did plan to kill multiple people of the group and try to trick every female into having sex with him multiple times.

    I would guess Jason Sudekis isn't available to be an every episode player so they will keep teasing him every now and then until they can get him for a good stretch.