I doubt he would want to bring it up again unless he was innocent. If he’s guilty then fuck him, but he deserves a chance. That is the problem with this site. This site is terrible for the cause.

Would the women have consented to sex if they knew the man posed as a fake woman, knew that he was taking photographs of them for free for his own personal use, and knew that they were having sex to please him for free (the women presumably were acting)? If they did not know those things, they did not have a full…

I clicked the link on Deadspin and started reading. I got about a paragraph in and started thinking, “wow, the author really seems to frame the whole article around the fact that the guy is definitely guilty”. Then I saw that I had been linked to a Jezebel article.

I’m going to give Yale the benefit of the doubt, and assume they expelled this guy because the evidence indicated he was guilty. But I also find some of the circumstances surrounding his due process are troubling.

no one person side, the female side.

What if he’s right?

It’s almost as if schools shouldn’t play kangaroo court when it comes to sexual assault cases.

I agree. The fake stwalley did say in her message that nude pics would be taken and that she would have to engage in sex. So for her to say she was surprised by the events that occurred would be a lie on her part. The alcohol does put everything into a grey area. But if the job had been real, I'm not sure she would…

Yeah, I was about to say people here are usually less cool with rape by deception laws when they are theoretically used against, for example, a Transwoman who gave a blow job to a guy who would have refused the blow job if he knew the lady was trans.

Do you also believe that in the videos where they pick up a girl on the side of the road and she fucks everyone in a van that that was really just some random girl walking down the street? Porn is a strategically tangled web of deceit.

If someone pretends to be rich and then isn’t, is that rape too now? What if they use a fake name?

In the state I live when police arrives if someone called 911 due to domestic violence, first they ask if everything is ok, then check with a light for bruises (which I had and on the there were stuff broken), then questioned the bruised one again, since I said everything was fine they do nothing, the victim has to…

You guys stop at nothing! You hear a story about Heard being an abuser in the past and then you totally disregard the attempt of the female victim to excuse the abuse and totally buy into her explanation that the abuse didn’t happen (‘over-sensationalized’), something you would never do with a suspected male abuser…

Besides its very unlikely for cops to arrest women for DV

I’ve just been mad that people form opinions about a case before all the evidence comes forward. Don’t want to be like all the people who supported the girls from Albany University who claimed they were the subject of a racial attack, only to find out the real story was completely reversed.

I was wondering why Jezebel didn’t have a post when the news that Heard was arrested for Domestic abuse before, but posted as soon as someone stood up for Heard.

what website do you think you are on right now? because you clearly don’t realize its jezebel

Well, if we’re going to play that game:

it’s all just very weird and off and i’m just bothered by all these statements by everyone I just want the whole truth to come out.

They BOTH ain’t SHIT.