*ahem*

That is a sound argument. Or, rather, it would be if 95% of the articles on Jalopnik weren’t car related.

That a bunch of dumb shits read Gawker, and that I should get a life and leave — except that I won’t. Thanks for playing; thanks for congratulating yourself in your hateful little echo chamber. I’m happy. :-) BTW... it was still daytime when you took your little tally. Most of the people who’d agree with me, because…

You’re singing my song. Also, not to over-generalize, but it’s funny how nobody came to my defense until about 5pm Eastern. I guess that’s when all the people with jobs, who might understand what it means to support something other than this stupid bile coming from the left, finally have time to comment at Gawker. As…

Agreed. Especially when I’m trying to read “tech” stuff over on Gizmodo, and they cross post all this shit. We get it. You guys hate Trump. Keep this crap within the blog it came from. No need to cross post a trump nuke blog post to a technology site. ugh!!

I actually agree with this on the premise of the headline/article. I like my news relatively unbiased, and without the hate the left has for anyone except them. FA/Jalop are usually relatively free of that, with exceptions like this post.

Ooooh... this comment right here aims to insult my intelligence. The insult is premised upon several assumed postulates and corollaries stemming from the assumed postulates. Here are the readily apparent examples:

But he’s right. We don’t go to weather.com to suddenly start seeing engine rebuild articles do we? I’d rightly and logically be angry if I kept finding articles about everything and anything other than weather on weather.com. There’s no way you can suggest that would make sense in any scenario. You say you’re pissed…

Yours is about the only response to my comment that impresses me. LOL. Nice work. Fair enough. But you don’t have to be such a dick about it. Was I a dick? No, and if you think otherwise, it’s the reflexive defenses you’ve raised, to protect your confirmation biases, fucking witchoo. Besides... the headline, I…

I don’t have to do so. That wasn’t my point. I beg of you to read my original comment again. But you won’t. Or, if you do, you’ll again pretend to think it argues something it doesn’t. But go ahead. Go take this conversation into realms the premise of my original comment never implied. Go knock yourself out. :-)

Actually, I had to read the god damned headline accidentally, simply by visiting Jalopnik. Some of us are sick of the constant one-sided politics and visit Jalopnik to escape that. As for my comment? Well, I didn’t have to respond to you, either — now did I?

Shhhhhhhhhhh.

I come to Jalopnik to see cool photos and pictures of automobiles; read interesting and clever articles about automobiles; peruse equal parts snarky, knowledgeable, and funny comments about automobiles; and write my own rarely knowledgeable, occasionally funny, and aspiring-to-be-snarky comments about automobiles. Oh,…

Of all the many things the Dems have done in the past decade, taking the high road is not one of them. Not by a mile.

And what exactly would be “helping”? Treating them with respect? Nah, respect has to be earned not given.

Look, when you’re as White as Matthew Lasner, you don’t need a reason

I don’t feel bad for Ivanka. Not at all. I am embarrassed this guy threw a temper tantrum though.

.... haven’t pulled this one out in a while, but; Dear Mr. Lasner and Dear Husband of Mr. Lasner,

“especially given that he never actually infected anybody”

No, he deserves to be punished. This is reckless endangerment. He gave someone HIV without informing them that it was a possibility. You can’t do that. I know that there are great meds now and viral loads can become undetectable but he still has HIV now for the rest of his life and has to take all of these drugs…