Why did the "government bureaucrats" try to do that? Because she has adjustment disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, personality disorder, and histrionic and narcissistic traits.

You can buy this chilled at the Terrior wine bars in NYC. It is the tits.

That's dumb, and you're dumb. Cider is the balls.

Cider is awesome...but it will give you serious shits.

"men could generally care less about confidence in a woman"

I am sometimes grateful that while I am not a monster or anything, I was not born with knock-down-amazing-attract-all-the-men-in-the-WORLD looks. Because I've never had to weigh whether or not Chanel bags are worth sex with an 80 year old racist.

You should read the entire statement because your statement is dumb and you should feel dumb.

You have to admire the relentless optimism of the average shirtless, dog-wielding dude. If you ask 1,000 super pretty corespondents if they want to go on a date, one might say yes.

Let's not be quick to dismiss this diamond-in-the-rough, ladies:

Speaking as a gay man - I support them 100% in their plans to ruin their company by not wanting to print specific things.

I completely agree. I think a print shop should have the right to refuse to print anti-gay stuff, and so I guess it should run the same in the other direction. I'd rather know that they were bigots and avoid them then keep giving them my money because they've kept quiet about it.

Of course what they were accused of in…

Here's my reservation. I think we're all in agreement that gay people have every right to be served by a place that would serve them if they were heterosexual. But what they state in the letter has little to do with actual homosexual customers. What they're stating they won't do is print things "promoting…

I feel the same way. I agree, these people are assholes and bigots but I'm not sure they're doing anything illegal. I mean, the most effective way of bringing them down at this point is to not give them any business. I thought about it this way; if someone like the aryan nations or something came in to my hypothetical…

You're being reasonable. That's going to get you shredded here.

Let's put it this way: if i had a shop to print shirts, i would refuse to print shirts with messages that promote guns, right wing political messages, and i would be very strict with the biblical fragments.

There is a difference between not serving the person, and not promoting the person's message.

Minority for the purposes of civil protection are defined very specifically. Federally speaking it extends to Race, Religion/ Creed, Military Service, and Sex.

Taking them to court for what? It's not illegal to limit the kinds of services you provide. It's not like they won't serve gays. They just won't print a gay-positive message. Gays are welcome to get their prints as long as it's not "Fuck yeah gays!"

Not discrimination, but the bigotry if on its own? So what? As long as they're not stepping on anyone, what does it matter?

I'm on edge about this. While it sucks that they won't print any gay stuff, and I certainly wouldn't do any business with them unless I absolutely had to, they also seem to have at least the notion of this whole "coexistence" thing. As long as they're not actively trying to go out of their way to trample on anyone,…