anarchyoftaste
AnarchyOfTaste
anarchyoftaste

Well the study did involve beetles and has nothing to do with brains, so I would just call it evolutionary biology, not evolution psychology. The fact that men do indeed exist, and are different in that they can’t actually bear children isn’t in dispute. This makes it different from the kind of evo psych that many

I’m a ginger who also kiteboards. I’m at the beach all the time. I’m constantly getting sprayed with water, and crashing into the bay or ocean. Just imagine wakeboarding, but doing it all day long. I’m out nearly every weekend in the Spring, Summer, and Fall, as well as several weekdays each week. Even in Winter, I

I’m a ginger who also kiteboards. I’m at the beach all the time. I’m constantly getting sprayed with water, and

Guilt is not a political problem to be solved; it’s a natural byproduct of luxury

Well put.

It kinda is, actually.

Yeah. I live in DC, a place where one would expect to find many great beers. I can find a sour here and there, and now that I know where to look, I can always find a few of my favorites. I can often find a few old and dusty ones at a particular liquor store, which is great, because sours taste better with age.

Bourbon is beer concentrate.

Or a Belgian that is also red, like this BILF right here:

Still stuck in the idyllic “yummy phase” of childhood, are ya? Don’t worry, you’ll come around to these delicious hoppy messes we call the IPA and you’ll love it.

I would totally fuck a Cantillon gueuze. Any lonely gueuze’s should come pay me a visit.

Really? In my experience, even some of the star commenters here at jezebel will say things they would never say in person or with their name attributed to it. What I said was “people act like dicks,” and here is an example of it:

People act like dicks when they can communicate with others anonymously. Just look through the comments of any controversial gawkerverse article.

Speech that incites violence is not necessarily irresponsible in the same way that dressing provacatively and getting sexually assaulted is not irresponsible. You are guilty of victim blaming.

The problem is that the anti-choice core value is NOT about un-born babies, but about controlling women’s sexuality.

You make it clear to the opposition that if they can’t provide good evidence for the existence of a ghost inside of a fetus, then there is no reason to prohibit abortions? At the very least, force them to make the case that America should be a theocracy- one that supports their ideas about god and souls and the like.

Absoultely. My post was long winded as it is, and all the potential conflicts between a “fetus with rights” and a mother would require volumes to hash out. The point you make is actually super complicated, just like standards for home self defense are. How much danger must a potential mother be in for her rights to

Yesterday a commenter got chided for criticizing the fact that certain countries jail gay people.

I hate the way abortion is debated pretty much everywhere. Perhaps Jezebel could do the right thing, and make an effort to talk about this issue in a more productive way.

But you aren’t allowed to criticize the culture because punching down or something.

It only pushes the boundaries because you and her predict a violent response by extremists. They are the reason the speech is dangerous, the speech itself is harmless.